Impact Simulation of Laser Powder Bed-Fused Polymeric Lattice Structures Using Mooney-Rivlin and Yeoh Hyperelastic Material Models: Calibration and Comparison

This study evaluates a methodology for the calibration of the 5-parameters Mooney-Rivlin and Yeoh 3rd-order hyperelastic material models for impact simulations on laser powder bed-fused TPU1301 lattices destined for personal protective equipment. To calibrate the models, bulk normalized specimens were printed and characterized using 400 mm/min uniaxial compression tests. Three 18% density 20-, 30- and 40 mm-thickness lattice structures, namely, Kelvin, body- and face-centered cubic, were manufactured and impact-tested. Using the material models, the impact tests were simulated using LS-Dyna, and their acceleration curves were compared with their experimental equivalents. The simulations accurately depicted the impact behavior of most lattices, but thicker specimens with lower peak accelerations and longer impact durations, such as the 40 mm Kelvin lattice, showed errors reaching 46 and 64% for the Yeoh and Mooney-Rivlin models, respectively. Furthermore, body-centered cubic lattices showed a softer behavior in simulations than experimentally. Overall, the Yeoh model provided the most accurate results across all topologies with an average error of 11.8% compared with 19.6% for Mooney-Rivlin. The methodology used in this study is therefore considered suitable for LPBF-printed TPU1301 lattice structures but would benefit from calibration at higher strain rates, biaxial and shear testing, and better meshing strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app162010160
Primary Topic
Cellular and Composite Structures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact Simulation of Laser Powder Bed-Fused Polymeric Lattice Structures Using Mooney-Rivlin and Yeoh Hyperelastic Material Models: Calibration and Comparison

William Turnier Trottier, Vladimir Braïlovski, Mika Loiselle
Applied Sciences
Cellular and Composite Structures
article

Impact Simulation of Laser Powder Bed-Fused Polymeric Lattice Structures Using Mooney-Rivlin and Yeoh Hyperelastic Material Models: Calibration and Comparison

William Turnier Trottier, Vladimir Braïlovski, Mika Loiselle
article en

Abstract

This study evaluates a methodology for the calibration of the 5-parameters Mooney-Rivlin and Yeoh 3rd-order hyperelastic material models for impact simulations on laser powder bed-fused TPU1301 lattices destined for personal protective equipment. To calibrate the models, bulk normalized specimens were printed and characterized using 400 mm/min uniaxial compression tests. Three 18% density 20-, 30- and 40 mm-thickness lattice structures, namely, Kelvin, body- and face-centered cubic, were manufactured and impact-tested. Using the material models, the impact tests were simulated using LS-Dyna, and their acceleration curves were compared with their experimental equivalents. The simulations accurately depicted the impact behavior of most lattices, but thicker specimens with lower peak accelerations and longer impact durations, such as the 40 mm Kelvin lattice, showed errors reaching 46 and 64% for the Yeoh and Mooney-Rivlin models, respectively. Furthermore, body-centered cubic lattices showed a softer behavior in simulations than experimentally. Overall, the Yeoh model provided the most accurate results across all topologies with an average error of 11.8% compared with 19.6% for Mooney-Rivlin. The methodology used in this study is therefore considered suitable for LPBF-printed TPU1301 lattice structures but would benefit from calibration at higher strain rates, biaxial and shear testing, and better meshing strategies.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(20)
École de Technologie Supérieure (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Cellular and Composite Structures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.