PLATFORM GOVERNANCE AND VALUE CO-CREATION IN GLOBAL SPORT

This study employs a comparative qualitative document analysis of FIFA+ and the International Olympic Committee's (IOC) digital ecosystem, drawing on seven institutional documents and eight peerreviewed publications. Guided by multi-sided platform economics, ecosystem-as-structure theory, and research on value co-creation in sport, the study examines six dimensions of platform governance: orchestration, partner access, interoperability, data stewardship, value allocation, and safeguards. According to official sources, FIFA+ recorded 211 million unique users during the 2022 FIFA World Cup in Qatar, while the Olympic Web and App attracted 325 million monthly unique users during the Paris 2024 Olympic Games. However, differences in measurement scope and reporting methodologies prevent direct comparisons between these figures. The findings highlight distinct governance approaches: FIFA+ emphasizes centralized content aggregation and commercial distribution, whereas the IOC's digital ecosystem integrates event-centred communication channels with an established media-rights network. Although both models support audience engagement and expand digital reach, publicly available evidence is insufficient to determine platform-level revenues or assess the equitable distribution of benefits among participating stakeholders. The proposed analytical framework remains conceptual and requires further empirical validation. Accordingly, the findings do not establish causal relationships or suggest a universally applicable model of platform governance in global sport.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23363403
Primary Topic
Digital Platforms and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

PLATFORM GOVERNANCE AND VALUE CO-CREATION IN GLOBAL SPORT

Boburjon Vafoev
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Digital Platforms and Economics
article

PLATFORM GOVERNANCE AND VALUE CO-CREATION IN GLOBAL SPORT

Boburjon Vafoev
article en

Abstract

This study employs a comparative qualitative document analysis of FIFA+ and the International Olympic Committee's (IOC) digital ecosystem, drawing on seven institutional documents and eight peerreviewed publications. Guided by multi-sided platform economics, ecosystem-as-structure theory, and research on value co-creation in sport, the study examines six dimensions of platform governance: orchestration, partner access, interoperability, data stewardship, value allocation, and safeguards. According to official sources, FIFA+ recorded 211 million unique users during the 2022 FIFA World Cup in Qatar, while the Olympic Web and App attracted 325 million monthly unique users during the Paris 2024 Olympic Games. However, differences in measurement scope and reporting methodologies prevent direct comparisons between these figures. The findings highlight distinct governance approaches: FIFA+ emphasizes centralized content aggregation and commercial distribution, whereas the IOC's digital ecosystem integrates event-centred communication channels with an established media-rights network. Although both models support audience engagement and expand digital reach, publicly available evidence is insufficient to determine platform-level revenues or assess the equitable distribution of benefits among participating stakeholders. The proposed analytical framework remains conceptual and requires further empirical validation. Accordingly, the findings do not establish causal relationships or suggest a universally applicable model of platform governance in global sport.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Tashkent State University of Economics (UZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Digital Platforms and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.