When Care Harms: Obstetric Violence as Institutional Trauma in Peru

Childbirth in health facilities now covers the large majority of births in Peru, and the conditions of institutional care shape the experience of almost every woman who gives birth. We argue that obstetric violence should be understood as a form of institutional production of psychological trauma, which quality-of-care frameworks do not capture. Accountability for mistreatment in childbirth is weak across health systems for reasons that extend beyond the legal status of the conduct, and Peru illustrates these limits: obstetric violence is named in sectoral technical standards but has not been legislated on, and the standards that prohibit specific practices attach no sanction to non-compliance. Drawing on this analysis and on evidence linking obstetric violence to perinatal posttraumatic stress and postnatal depression, we propose that such harm be recognized as iatrogenic. We outline implications for trauma-informed care, for informed consent as a clinical process, and for the systematic monitoring of women's experiences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Birth
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.70142
Primary Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When Care Harms: Obstetric Violence as Institutional Trauma in Peru

Olenka Retiz, Eimy Fernández
Birth
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
article

When Care Harms: Obstetric Violence as Institutional Trauma in Peru

Olenka Retiz, Eimy Fernández
article en

Abstract

Childbirth in health facilities now covers the large majority of births in Peru, and the conditions of institutional care shape the experience of almost every woman who gives birth. We argue that obstetric violence should be understood as a form of institutional production of psychological trauma, which quality-of-care frameworks do not capture. Accountability for mistreatment in childbirth is weak across health systems for reasons that extend beyond the legal status of the conduct, and Peru illustrates these limits: obstetric violence is named in sectoral technical standards but has not been legislated on, and the standards that prohibit specific practices attach no sanction to non-compliance. Drawing on this analysis and on evidence linking obstetric violence to perinatal posttraumatic stress and postnatal depression, we propose that such harm be recognized as iatrogenic. We outline implications for trauma-informed care, for informed consent as a clinical process, and for the systematic monitoring of women's experiences.

Birth
Universidad del Desarrollo (CL), Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PE)
Good health and well-being, Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.