A Land Potential‐Based Framework for Wind Erosion and Sand and Dust Storm Source Mitigation

ABSTRACT Wind erosion and sand and dust storms are a global challenge. While many management practices to mitigate sources of wind erosion and sand and dust storms have been documented, existing guidance largely emphasizes what practices are available, with limited information on where and under what ecological conditions they should be applied. As a result, mitigation efforts can be ineffective or can exacerbate erosion when implemented without regard to local ecological context. Land potential, or the inherent capacity of land to support vegetation, soil stability, and productivity, provides a basis for aligning mitigation practices with a site's resistance and resilience to erosion. Here, we present a land potential‐based framework to improve the selection, implementation, and evaluation of wind erosion and sand and dust storm source mitigation practices across diverse landscapes. The framework uses land potential assessment with agroecological state concepts to guide decision‐making through the following steps: (1) characterize land potential by soils, topography, and climate to identify resistance and resilience to erosion; (2) identify agroecological states that capture vegetation–soil configurations, thresholds, and feedbacks determining erosion dynamics; (3) identify and monitor wind erosion risk and sand and dust storm source areas; (4) define mitigation targets and benchmarks that guide decision‐making; (5) identify and implement practices to avoid, reduce, reverse, or accept wind erosion; and (6) evaluate mitigation outcomes and adapt management. By linking local‐scale land assessments with mitigation practices, this framework increases the likelihood of successful mitigation and provides scalable decision support for advancing Land Degradation Neutrality and sustainable land management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land Degradation and Development
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.70913
Primary Topic
Aeolian processes and effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Land Potential‐Based Framework for Wind Erosion and Sand and Dust Storm Source Mitigation

Matthew A. Bowker, Brandon L. Edwards, Laura M. Burkett, Brandon T. Bestelmeyer et al.
Land Degradation and Development
Aeolian processes and effects
article

A Land Potential‐Based Framework for Wind Erosion and Sand and Dust Storm Source Mitigation

Matthew A. Bowker, Brandon L. Edwards, Laura M. Burkett, Brandon T. Bestelmeyer, Nicholas P. Webb, Jeffrey E. Herrick, Sarah E. McCord, Kristina E. Young, Carrie‐Ann Houdeshell
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Wind erosion and sand and dust storms are a global challenge. While many management practices to mitigate sources of wind erosion and sand and dust storms have been documented, existing guidance largely emphasizes what practices are available, with limited information on where and under what ecological conditions they should be applied. As a result, mitigation efforts can be ineffective or can exacerbate erosion when implemented without regard to local ecological context. Land potential, or the inherent capacity of land to support vegetation, soil stability, and productivity, provides a basis for aligning mitigation practices with a site's resistance and resilience to erosion. Here, we present a land potential‐based framework to improve the selection, implementation, and evaluation of wind erosion and sand and dust storm source mitigation practices across diverse landscapes. The framework uses land potential assessment with agroecological state concepts to guide decision‐making through the following steps: (1) characterize land potential by soils, topography, and climate to identify resistance and resilience to erosion; (2) identify agroecological states that capture vegetation–soil configurations, thresholds, and feedbacks determining erosion dynamics; (3) identify and monitor wind erosion risk and sand and dust storm source areas; (4) define mitigation targets and benchmarks that guide decision‐making; (5) identify and implement practices to avoid, reduce, reverse, or accept wind erosion; and (6) evaluate mitigation outcomes and adapt management. By linking local‐scale land assessments with mitigation practices, this framework increases the likelihood of successful mitigation and provides scalable decision support for advancing Land Degradation Neutrality and sustainable land management.

Land Degradation and Development
Agricultural Research Service (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Northern Arizona University (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Life on land, Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Aeolian processes and effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.