Correlation between the dysfunctional lens index and subjective grading for different types of cataracts.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the dysfunctional lens index scale (DLI) measured by iTrace is a valuable and objective measurement for evaluating the severity of cataract. DESIGN: Single-centre, retrospective, noninterventional observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Participants seen at the Eye Physicians and Surgeons' clinic from January 2023 to January 2024 were included. METHODS: All patients underwent a comprehensive ophthalmologic examination by a single surgeon. This included DLI measurement via the ray-tracing aberrometry system (iTrace Visual Function Analyzer by Tracey Technologies) and an eye examination after pupil dilation and classification of the type of cataracts on the basis of the Lens Opacification Classification System II (LOCS II). Inclusion criteria included a clinical diagnosis of any cataract type, age ≥18 years, and healthy eyes with only cataracts. Participants were excluded if they had a previous history of ocular trauma, ocular surgery, including laser refractive treatment, irregular corneal astigmatism, corneal opacity, scarring, or dystrophies, ocular diseases other than age-related cataract, and pupil diameters of <4.0 mm in the dark. RESULTS: ); when DLI increased, best-corrected visual acuity decreased. The optimal DLI cut-off for predicting cataract surgery was 8.01, yielding a sensitivity of 0.83, specificity of 0.81, and an area under the curve of 0.82. Values below this threshold were associated with a greater likelihood of requiring surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The DLI can be a valuable objective measurement for the severity of nuclear and posterior subcapsular cataracts but not for anterior cortical cataract. A DLI threshold of 8.01 demonstrated moderate discriminative ability for surgical status in this cohort; however, given the retrospective design, DLI should be considered an adjunctive or confirmatory measure rather than an independent criterion for cataract surgery. This study highlights the transformative potential of objective metrics like the DLI, offering significant advancements in identifying visually significant cataracts and their management.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2026.09.011
Primary Topic
Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correlation between the dysfunctional lens index and subjective grading for different types of cataracts.

Irina A Dinu, Nastaran Hajizadeh Bastani, M Hermina Strungaru, Mohammed Khan
PubMed
Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
article

Correlation between the dysfunctional lens index and subjective grading for different types of cataracts.

Irina A Dinu, Nastaran Hajizadeh Bastani, M Hermina Strungaru, Mohammed Khan
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the dysfunctional lens index scale (DLI) measured by iTrace is a valuable and objective measurement for evaluating the severity of cataract. DESIGN: Single-centre, retrospective, noninterventional observational study. PARTICIPANTS: Participants seen at the Eye Physicians and Surgeons' clinic from January 2023 to January 2024 were included. METHODS: All patients underwent a comprehensive ophthalmologic examination by a single surgeon. This included DLI measurement via the ray-tracing aberrometry system (iTrace Visual Function Analyzer by Tracey Technologies) and an eye examination after pupil dilation and classification of the type of cataracts on the basis of the Lens Opacification Classification System II (LOCS II). Inclusion criteria included a clinical diagnosis of any cataract type, age ≥18 years, and healthy eyes with only cataracts. Participants were excluded if they had a previous history of ocular trauma, ocular surgery, including laser refractive treatment, irregular corneal astigmatism, corneal opacity, scarring, or dystrophies, ocular diseases other than age-related cataract, and pupil diameters of <4.0 mm in the dark. RESULTS: ); when DLI increased, best-corrected visual acuity decreased. The optimal DLI cut-off for predicting cataract surgery was 8.01, yielding a sensitivity of 0.83, specificity of 0.81, and an area under the curve of 0.82. Values below this threshold were associated with a greater likelihood of requiring surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The DLI can be a valuable objective measurement for the severity of nuclear and posterior subcapsular cataracts but not for anterior cortical cataract. A DLI threshold of 8.01 demonstrated moderate discriminative ability for surgical status in this cohort; however, given the retrospective design, DLI should be considered an adjunctive or confirmatory measure rather than an independent criterion for cataract surgery. This study highlights the transformative potential of objective metrics like the DLI, offering significant advancements in identifying visually significant cataracts and their management.

PubMed
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.