Cost-effectiveness of early versus delayed disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for psoriatic arthritis

Background Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are standard first-line therapy for psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Observational studies suggest earlier initiation is associated with superior minimal disease activity (MDA) attainment, yet the economic and health implications of treatment timing remain uncertain. This cost-utility analysis evaluated the cost-effectiveness of early versus delayed DMARD initiation in DMARD-naive adults with PsA from a U.S. payer perspective. Methods We built a cohort state-transition (Markov) model (monthly cycles, 15-year horizon) from published data (2000–2025). Patients initiated a DMARD under two strategies: early (≤1 year post-diagnosis) and delayed initiation (>1 year). Patients remained in the pre-treatment state for six months prior to response assignment, then transitioned among complete response (sustained MDA), partial response (non-sustained MDA), non-response, no treatment, and death. Primary outcomes included the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and incremental net monetary benefit (INMB). Uncertainty intervals (UIs) were derived from probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Findings Early DMARD initiation provided an additional 0.56 (95% UI, 0.32–0.83) QALYs at an incremental cost of –US$43,902.94 (95% UI, –US$147,096.29 to US$61,615.86) per patient relative to delayed initiation, yielding a favourable ICER (–US$78,398.11/QALY). At a willingness-to-pay threshold of US$50,000/QALY, mean INMB was US$71,902.94 (95% UI, –US$36,663.51 to US$176,658.91), with early initiation preferred in 90.6% of simulations. Interpretation Early DMARD initiation was associated with improved long-term health outcomes at reduced costs, suggesting timely DMARD initiation may represent a high-value strategy. Given the observational basis of the key treatment-timing input, findings support disease-duration stratified analyses of existing phase III trials and further characterization of access delays. Funding None.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2026.101661
Primary Topic
Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost-effectiveness of early versus delayed disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for psoriatic arthritis

Julien Ringuet, Elena Netchiporouk, Julian Cappelli, Anastasiya Muntyanu et al.
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
article

Cost-effectiveness of early versus delayed disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for psoriatic arthritis

Julien Ringuet, Elena Netchiporouk, Julian Cappelli, Anastasiya Muntyanu, Dafna D. Gladman, Mohammed Kaouache, Elham Rahme, Alexander Tsoukas, Stephanie R. Goldberg, Sabrina Hundal, Savanah Haidar, Mohamed Osman
article en

Abstract

Background Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are standard first-line therapy for psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Observational studies suggest earlier initiation is associated with superior minimal disease activity (MDA) attainment, yet the economic and health implications of treatment timing remain uncertain. This cost-utility analysis evaluated the cost-effectiveness of early versus delayed DMARD initiation in DMARD-naive adults with PsA from a U.S. payer perspective. Methods We built a cohort state-transition (Markov) model (monthly cycles, 15-year horizon) from published data (2000–2025). Patients initiated a DMARD under two strategies: early (≤1 year post-diagnosis) and delayed initiation (>1 year). Patients remained in the pre-treatment state for six months prior to response assignment, then transitioned among complete response (sustained MDA), partial response (non-sustained MDA), non-response, no treatment, and death. Primary outcomes included the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and incremental net monetary benefit (INMB). Uncertainty intervals (UIs) were derived from probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Findings Early DMARD initiation provided an additional 0.56 (95% UI, 0.32–0.83) QALYs at an incremental cost of –US$43,902.94 (95% UI, –US$147,096.29 to US$61,615.86) per patient relative to delayed initiation, yielding a favourable ICER (–US$78,398.11/QALY). At a willingness-to-pay threshold of US$50,000/QALY, mean INMB was US$71,902.94 (95% UI, –US$36,663.51 to US$176,658.91), with early initiation preferred in 90.6% of simulations. Interpretation Early DMARD initiation was associated with improved long-term health outcomes at reduced costs, suggesting timely DMARD initiation may represent a high-value strategy. Given the observational basis of the key treatment-timing input, findings support disease-duration stratified analyses of existing phase III trials and further characterization of access delays. Funding None.

The Lancet Regional Health - AmericasVol. 65
University Health Network (CA), Prince Sultan University (SA), University of Alberta (CA), University of Calgary (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Toronto Western Hospital (CA), McGill University Health Centre (CA), Mary Washington Hospital (US), Centre de Recherche Dermatologique du Québec Métropolitain (CA), Schroeder Arthritis Institute, McGill University (CA), Université de Montréal (CA), McMaster University (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.