Evaluation of the accuracy, completeness, and compliance of current summary reporting of adverse events to the Food and Drug Administration using the manufacturer and user facility device experience (MAUDE) database: cross sectional study

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy and completeness of adverse event summary reports for medical devices and compliance of the reports with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requirements. DESIGN: Cross sectional study. SETTING: The FDA manufacturer and user facility device experience (MAUDE) database. PARTICIPANTS: All adverse event summary reports filed in MAUDE from July 2019 to June 2025. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Identification of device problem codes, appropriate identification as summary reports in the submission form, concordance between the number of events data field and the report narrative, and compliance with FDA reporting deadlines. RESULTS: 6308 summary reports were submitted to MAUDE containing 159 503 adverse events. Use of summary reports increased from 808 to 1757 between 2020 and 2024, a factor of 1.21 per year (P<0.001). Most (91%) adverse events in summary reports were for class 3 high risk devices. Summary reports lacked descriptions of potential device related problems: 57% of reports denoted an "adverse event without identified device or use problem" and 38% of reports selected "insufficient information" in the device problem code data field. Manufacturers incorrectly checked "N" (no) in the summary report (Y/N, reporting yes/no) field for 694 summary reports (11%) and erroneously listed "n=1" under the number of events field for 423 summary reports (7%), causing an undercount of 11 902 adverse events. The majority (55%) of summary reports failed to comply with the FDA reporting deadline of 30 days after the manufacturer became aware of the adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse event summary reports in MAUDE are frequently incomplete, inaccurate, and delayed. Improvements are needed to ensure timely identification of device safety signals and uphold FDA transparency standards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2026-100812
Primary Topic
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the accuracy, completeness, and compliance of current summary reporting of adverse events to the Food and Drug Administration using the manufacturer and user facility device experience (MAUDE) database: cross sectional study

Alyssa Zhou, Rita F. Redberg, Sarah R. Tingley, Madris Kinard
BMJ
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
article

Evaluation of the accuracy, completeness, and compliance of current summary reporting of adverse events to the Food and Drug Administration using the manufacturer and user facility device experience (MAUDE) database: cross sectional study

Alyssa Zhou, Rita F. Redberg, Sarah R. Tingley, Madris Kinard
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy and completeness of adverse event summary reports for medical devices and compliance of the reports with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requirements. DESIGN: Cross sectional study. SETTING: The FDA manufacturer and user facility device experience (MAUDE) database. PARTICIPANTS: All adverse event summary reports filed in MAUDE from July 2019 to June 2025. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Identification of device problem codes, appropriate identification as summary reports in the submission form, concordance between the number of events data field and the report narrative, and compliance with FDA reporting deadlines. RESULTS: 6308 summary reports were submitted to MAUDE containing 159 503 adverse events. Use of summary reports increased from 808 to 1757 between 2020 and 2024, a factor of 1.21 per year (P<0.001). Most (91%) adverse events in summary reports were for class 3 high risk devices. Summary reports lacked descriptions of potential device related problems: 57% of reports denoted an "adverse event without identified device or use problem" and 38% of reports selected "insufficient information" in the device problem code data field. Manufacturers incorrectly checked "N" (no) in the summary report (Y/N, reporting yes/no) field for 694 summary reports (11%) and erroneously listed "n=1" under the number of events field for 423 summary reports (7%), causing an undercount of 11 902 adverse events. The majority (55%) of summary reports failed to comply with the FDA reporting deadline of 30 days after the manufacturer became aware of the adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse event summary reports in MAUDE are frequently incomplete, inaccurate, and delayed. Improvements are needed to ensure timely identification of device safety signals and uphold FDA transparency standards.

BMJVol. 395
University of California, San Francisco (US)
University of California, San Francisco
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.