Burckhardt, Nietzsche und die Kritik der wissenschaftlichen Methode

Abstract The contribution reframes Burckhardt and Nietzsche’s problematisation of scientific methodologies in the study of the humanities as an act of broader cultural critique. By contextualising this problematisation in their respective relationships with their scholarly mentors, and thus by highlighting the heterodoxy of their contribution to the academic endeavour, the article identifies this very heterodoxy as Burckhardt and Nietzsche’s most tangible contribution to critical theory. The analysis focuses on a few pivotal questions of methods, evincing two postures that were all but conservative, and that cannot but disprove the nowadays canonical portrait of two conservative thinkers. The main hypothesis is that the ultimate difference between their analogous disdain for positivistic trends resides in the different extent to which they could turn these postures into real life choices, reflecting in turn a different ability to forestall questions that were to arise in the following century.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Nietzscheforschung
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/nifo-2026-014
Primary Topic
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Burckhardt, Nietzsche und die Kritik der wissenschaftlichen Methode

Neriojamil Palumbo
Nietzscheforschung
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
article

Burckhardt, Nietzsche und die Kritik der wissenschaftlichen Methode

Neriojamil Palumbo
article en

Abstract

Abstract The contribution reframes Burckhardt and Nietzsche’s problematisation of scientific methodologies in the study of the humanities as an act of broader cultural critique. By contextualising this problematisation in their respective relationships with their scholarly mentors, and thus by highlighting the heterodoxy of their contribution to the academic endeavour, the article identifies this very heterodoxy as Burckhardt and Nietzsche’s most tangible contribution to critical theory. The analysis focuses on a few pivotal questions of methods, evincing two postures that were all but conservative, and that cannot but disprove the nowadays canonical portrait of two conservative thinkers. The main hypothesis is that the ultimate difference between their analogous disdain for positivistic trends resides in the different extent to which they could turn these postures into real life choices, reflecting in turn a different ability to forestall questions that were to arise in the following century.

NietzscheforschungVol. 33(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.