Reliability and measurement error of a wearable sensor for tibial acceleration and cadence in recreational runners

Abstract Running is an increasingly popular sport; however, injuries remain common concern among runners. The impact of tibial acceleration and cadence at different running stages has been the focus of ongoing research. While wearable devices have been developed to analyze running biomechanics, their reliability requires further investigation. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and measurement error of the TgForce ® device in assessing tibial acceleration and cadence in runners. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 43 rearfoot-strike runners. Participants ran on a motorized treadmill for three minutes while wearing the accelerometer attached to the anteromedial region of the tibia. The device measured tibial acceleration (g) and cadence (steps/min). Participants completed the protocol twice, with a seven-day interval, and were evaluated by two examiners. The device demonstrated good inter-rater reliability for vertical tibial acceleration (ICC: 0.79; SEM: 0.93 g; SDC: 2.58 g), sagittal tibial acceleration (ICC: 0.85; SEM: 1.14 g; SDC: 3.18 g), resultant tibial acceleration (ICC: 0.81; SEM: 1.08 g; SDC: 3.01 g), and cadence (ICC: 0.88; SEM: 8.60 steps/min; SDC: 23.86 steps/min). Intra-rater reliability was good for vertical tibial acceleration (ICC: 0.82) and moderate for sagittal tibial acceleration (ICC: 0.65), resultant tibial acceleration (ICC: 0.71), and cadence (ICC: 0.73). Proportional bias was observed in the inter-rater measurement of vertical tibial acceleration and the intra-rater measurement of sagittal tibial acceleration, while systematic bias was observed in the intra-rater measurements of sagittal and resultant tibial acceleration. In conclusion, the accelerometer demonstrated moderate-to-good reliability for assessing tibial acceleration and cadence in recreational runners. Caution is warranted when interpreting small changes in cadence due to the observed measurement error (SEM and SDC). Further research is needed to evaluate reliability under real-world running conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sports Engineering
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-026-00571-6
Primary Topic
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability and measurement error of a wearable sensor for tibial acceleration and cadence in recreational runners

João Paulo Chieregato Matheus, L F Moreira, Thiago Vilela Lemos, Maikon Gleibyson Rodrigues dos Santos et al.
Sports Engineering
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
article

Reliability and measurement error of a wearable sensor for tibial acceleration and cadence in recreational runners

João Paulo Chieregato Matheus, L F Moreira, Thiago Vilela Lemos, Maikon Gleibyson Rodrigues dos Santos, Leonardo Luiz Barretti Secchi, Glauber Marques Paraizo Barbosa, Renata Teles Pereira, José Roberto de Souza Júnior, Yasmin Almeida Araújo
article en

Abstract

Abstract Running is an increasingly popular sport; however, injuries remain common concern among runners. The impact of tibial acceleration and cadence at different running stages has been the focus of ongoing research. While wearable devices have been developed to analyze running biomechanics, their reliability requires further investigation. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and measurement error of the TgForce ® device in assessing tibial acceleration and cadence in runners. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 43 rearfoot-strike runners. Participants ran on a motorized treadmill for three minutes while wearing the accelerometer attached to the anteromedial region of the tibia. The device measured tibial acceleration (g) and cadence (steps/min). Participants completed the protocol twice, with a seven-day interval, and were evaluated by two examiners. The device demonstrated good inter-rater reliability for vertical tibial acceleration (ICC: 0.79; SEM: 0.93 g; SDC: 2.58 g), sagittal tibial acceleration (ICC: 0.85; SEM: 1.14 g; SDC: 3.18 g), resultant tibial acceleration (ICC: 0.81; SEM: 1.08 g; SDC: 3.01 g), and cadence (ICC: 0.88; SEM: 8.60 steps/min; SDC: 23.86 steps/min). Intra-rater reliability was good for vertical tibial acceleration (ICC: 0.82) and moderate for sagittal tibial acceleration (ICC: 0.65), resultant tibial acceleration (ICC: 0.71), and cadence (ICC: 0.73). Proportional bias was observed in the inter-rater measurement of vertical tibial acceleration and the intra-rater measurement of sagittal tibial acceleration, while systematic bias was observed in the intra-rater measurements of sagittal and resultant tibial acceleration. In conclusion, the accelerometer demonstrated moderate-to-good reliability for assessing tibial acceleration and cadence in recreational runners. Caution is warranted when interpreting small changes in cadence due to the observed measurement error (SEM and SDC). Further research is needed to evaluate reliability under real-world running conditions.

Sports EngineeringVol. 29(2)
Universidade de Brasília (BR), Fundação de Apoio a Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás (BR), University Center of Brasília (BR)
Universidade de Brasília
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.