Learning-guided sampling: finite classes and one-sided reliability

We study sampling from an unknown member of a known finite class using approximate prefix masses. Under pointwise guidance, the worst-case query complexity is min{M, n√(log M), n²} up to logarithms. We show that one-sided safety and bounded stopped reciprocal capacity can nevertheless change the cost of a specified class from logarithmic to linear, with exact linear caps at fixed error and for exact sampling. For a known background plus an unknown atom of weight α, we determine the worst-case rate over backgrounds as Θ(1 + min{αM, α⁻¹log(1 + 2ⁿα²)}) at error at most α/4. A uniform background admits a sharper rate. The upper bounds derive membership tests and atom recovery from the guide; independent fallback sampling controls the complete output law. A composition theorem separates global certification from difficult fixed-error sampling. We also give a self-contained quadratic upper bound under weak guidance. The general fixed-error finite-class gap remains open. The numbered results are formalized in Lean 4, with the cited finite-class upper bound as an explicit hypothesis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23378982
Primary Topic
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Learning-guided sampling: finite classes and one-sided reliability

Samuel Mausberg
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
preprint

Learning-guided sampling: finite classes and one-sided reliability

Samuel Mausberg
preprint en

Abstract

We study sampling from an unknown member of a known finite class using approximate prefix masses. Under pointwise guidance, the worst-case query complexity is min{M, n√(log M), n²} up to logarithms. We show that one-sided safety and bounded stopped reciprocal capacity can nevertheless change the cost of a specified class from logarithmic to linear, with exact linear caps at fixed error and for exact sampling. For a known background plus an unknown atom of weight α, we determine the worst-case rate over backgrounds as Θ(1 + min{αM, α⁻¹log(1 + 2ⁿα²)}) at error at most α/4. A uniform background admits a sharper rate. The upper bounds derive membership tests and atom recovery from the guide; independent fallback sampling controls the complete output law. A composition theorem separates global certification from difficult fixed-error sampling. We also give a self-contained quadratic upper bound under weak guidance. The general fixed-error finite-class gap remains open. The numbered results are formalized in Lean 4, with the cited finite-class upper bound as an explicit hypothesis.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.