Amblyopia treatment outcomes did not differ in a multi-regional binocular treatment trial between Chinese Han and White children

To date, no study has compared amblyopia treatment outcomes between White and Chinese Han children treated using a similar protocol, and data are lacking on whether treatment efficacy differs by race/ethnicity. This post-hoc exploratory analysis compared two methods of amblyopia treatment outcomes (patching and binocular treatment (CureSight, NovaSight, Israel) between Chinese Han and White children enrolled in a prospective, multicenter, evaluator-masked randomized clinical trial. A total of 186 children aged 4 to < 9 years (137 White; 49 Chinese Han) with anisometropic, strabismic, or mixed-mechanism amblyopia were randomized in 1:1 ratio to home-based binocular treatment (90 min/day, 5 days/week) or patching (2 h/day, 7 days/week) for 16 weeks. Overall amblyopic-eye visual acuity (VA) improvement was similar in White and Chinese Han participants (0.25 ± 0.13 and 0.24 ± 0.11 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (mean ± standard deviation), respectively; both p < 0.0001); the between-race least-squares mean difference was -0.026 logMAR (95% CI -0.209 to 0.157; p = 0.777). No significant between-race differences were found in stereoacuity improvement (p = 0.15) or binocular VA improvement (p = 0.856). Adherence exceeded 85% in both groups (monitored objectively via eye-tracking logs for binocular treatment and via parental diaries for patching); no serious adverse events were reported. These findings suggest that amblyopia treatment outcomes may not differ meaningfully by race/ethnicity, though the small Chinese Han sample (n = 49) limits definitive conclusions. Larger prospective studies are warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-74943-0
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Amblyopia treatment outcomes did not differ in a multi-regional binocular treatment trial between Chinese Han and White children

M Wang, Majd Arow, Ilya Ortenberg, Brandy Scombordi et al.
Scientific Reports
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Amblyopia treatment outcomes did not differ in a multi-regional binocular treatment trial between Chinese Han and White children

M Wang, Majd Arow, Ilya Ortenberg, Brandy Scombordi, Nausheen Khuddus, Oren Yehezkel, Koni Arnold, Tamara Wygnanski-Jaffe, Adrian Kun, Ronen Rabinovich, Laura Bejarano, Erin C. Jenewein, Jasmine Campbell, Eedy Mezer, Burton J. Kushner, Nicholas A. Sala, Jenny Myung, Gaylord G. Ventura, Gabriel Avraham, Eric R. Crouch, Luba Rodov, Abraham Spierer, Haia Katz, Alexandra Goz, Michael Belkin, Ahuva Shpigelman, Maoz Hadash, Hana Leib, Anabel Bazov, Emad Borsha, Idit Keynann, Nathalie Corcos, Vered Brucker, Eran Laster, Ronit Politi, Hila Givoni, Ahed Amitirat, Adelina Zioni, Katty Kuperman, Nethanel Zitzer, Nadine Jaffe, Yael Corcos, C. J. Barrett, Keren Roll, Chaim Nissen, Dan Cohen, Meital Abecassis, The CureSight Pivotal Trial Group, Rinat Cohen, Rhonda Hodde, Brittany Troiano, Reut Parness, Wei Zhang, Juan Bu, Rui Liu, Hong Liu, Lori Zeto, Rui Hao, Nicholas Sala, Robert W. Arnold, Wesley Cox, Tammy Toskes, Iesha Hamric, Shu Wang, Casey de Veer
article en

Abstract

To date, no study has compared amblyopia treatment outcomes between White and Chinese Han children treated using a similar protocol, and data are lacking on whether treatment efficacy differs by race/ethnicity. This post-hoc exploratory analysis compared two methods of amblyopia treatment outcomes (patching and binocular treatment (CureSight, NovaSight, Israel) between Chinese Han and White children enrolled in a prospective, multicenter, evaluator-masked randomized clinical trial. A total of 186 children aged 4 to < 9 years (137 White; 49 Chinese Han) with anisometropic, strabismic, or mixed-mechanism amblyopia were randomized in 1:1 ratio to home-based binocular treatment (90 min/day, 5 days/week) or patching (2 h/day, 7 days/week) for 16 weeks. Overall amblyopic-eye visual acuity (VA) improvement was similar in White and Chinese Han participants (0.25 ± 0.13 and 0.24 ± 0.11 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (mean ± standard deviation), respectively; both p < 0.0001); the between-race least-squares mean difference was -0.026 logMAR (95% CI -0.209 to 0.157; p = 0.777). No significant between-race differences were found in stereoacuity improvement (p = 0.15) or binocular VA improvement (p = 0.856). Adherence exceeded 85% in both groups (monitored objectively via eye-tracking logs for binocular treatment and via parental diaries for patching); no serious adverse events were reported. These findings suggest that amblyopia treatment outcomes may not differ meaningfully by race/ethnicity, though the small Chinese Han sample (n = 49) limits definitive conclusions. Larger prospective studies are warranted.

Scientific Reports
Drexel University Elkins Park Campus (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Tel Aviv University (IL), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Fudan University (CN), Sheba Medical Center (IL), Kaplan Medical Center (IL), Soroka Medical Center (IL), Rambam Health Care Campus (IL), Shaare Zedek Medical Center (IL), Maccabi Healthcare Services (IL), Shanghai Children's Medical Center (CN), Erie VA Medical Center (US), Eye & ENT Hospital of Fudan University (CN), Eriez (United States) (US), Virginia Eye Consultants (US), Peking University Third Hospital (CN), Tianjin Medical University Eye Hospital (CN)
Research to Prevent Blindness
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.