Quantifying the Stability–Energy trade-off in H2–CH4 mixed hydrates for hydrogen-enriched natural gas storage: A fugacity-corrected thermodynamic framework

Hydrogen storage remains a critical bottleneck in clean energy systems, with conventional approaches imposing significant trade-offs between energy density, safety, and cost. This study develops a dual-metric framework to quantify stability–energy trade-offs in mixed H 2 –CH 4 hydrates, integrating fugacity-corrected thermodynamic regression, a destabilization index (ΔT), and a net energy index (NEI) across compositions from 0 to 65.9 mol% H 2 and pressures from 3.0 to 20.7 MPa. Fugacity correction using the Peng–Robinson equation of state yielded apparent dissociation enthalpies ranging from 62.5 to 71.1 kJ/mol, revealing a non-monotonic profile with cooperative stabilization at moderate hydrogen fractions attributed to complementary cage occupancy. The destabilization index followed a power-law relationship (R 2 = 0.976), with penalties remaining below 5 K for compositions under 42 mol% H 2 but accelerating to approximately 10 K at 65.9 mol% H 2 . The destabilization index is referenced to the lowest-hydrogen composition in the dataset (4.55 mol% H 2 ), which spans the full experimental pressure range, rather than to pure methane hydrate, whose three-phase equilibrium data are limited to pressures below ∼8 MPa. Energy analysis demonstrated that volumetric energy density declined from 3750 to 2100 MJ m −3 with increasing hydrogen content, with hydrogen contributing less than 45% of stored energy even at maximum loading—indicating that mixed hydrates function as methane carriers with incidental hydrogen co-storage. The unified model reproduced the 45-point training set with R 2 = 0.997 (RMSE = 0.23 K); against 11 independent literature points, interpolation to 20 mol% H 2 achieved R 2 = 0.90 (RMSE = 1.15 K), while extrapolation to 80 mol% H 2 degraded to RMSE ≈ 2.5 K, comparable in magnitude to the destabilization penalties at moderate compositions and restricting reliable application to 0–66 mol% H 2 . These findings establish quantitative boundaries for mixed hydrate applications, suggesting favorable prospects for hydrogen-enriched natural gas systems below 20 mol% H 2 while demonstrating fundamental limitations for dedicated hydrogen storage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.157950
Primary Topic
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying the Stability–Energy trade-off in H2–CH4 mixed hydrates for hydrogen-enriched natural gas storage: A fugacity-corrected thermodynamic framework

Nayef M. Alsaifi, Jai Krishna Sahith Sayani, Muhammad Saad Khan
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
article

Quantifying the Stability–Energy trade-off in H2–CH4 mixed hydrates for hydrogen-enriched natural gas storage: A fugacity-corrected thermodynamic framework

Nayef M. Alsaifi, Jai Krishna Sahith Sayani, Muhammad Saad Khan
article en

Abstract

Hydrogen storage remains a critical bottleneck in clean energy systems, with conventional approaches imposing significant trade-offs between energy density, safety, and cost. This study develops a dual-metric framework to quantify stability–energy trade-offs in mixed H 2 –CH 4 hydrates, integrating fugacity-corrected thermodynamic regression, a destabilization index (ΔT), and a net energy index (NEI) across compositions from 0 to 65.9 mol% H 2 and pressures from 3.0 to 20.7 MPa. Fugacity correction using the Peng–Robinson equation of state yielded apparent dissociation enthalpies ranging from 62.5 to 71.1 kJ/mol, revealing a non-monotonic profile with cooperative stabilization at moderate hydrogen fractions attributed to complementary cage occupancy. The destabilization index followed a power-law relationship (R 2 = 0.976), with penalties remaining below 5 K for compositions under 42 mol% H 2 but accelerating to approximately 10 K at 65.9 mol% H 2 . The destabilization index is referenced to the lowest-hydrogen composition in the dataset (4.55 mol% H 2 ), which spans the full experimental pressure range, rather than to pure methane hydrate, whose three-phase equilibrium data are limited to pressures below ∼8 MPa. Energy analysis demonstrated that volumetric energy density declined from 3750 to 2100 MJ m −3 with increasing hydrogen content, with hydrogen contributing less than 45% of stored energy even at maximum loading—indicating that mixed hydrates function as methane carriers with incidental hydrogen co-storage. The unified model reproduced the 45-point training set with R 2 = 0.997 (RMSE = 0.23 K); against 11 independent literature points, interpolation to 20 mol% H 2 achieved R 2 = 0.90 (RMSE = 1.15 K), while extrapolation to 80 mol% H 2 degraded to RMSE ≈ 2.5 K, comparable in magnitude to the destabilization penalties at moderate compositions and restricting reliable application to 0–66 mol% H 2 . These findings establish quantitative boundaries for mixed hydrate applications, suggesting favorable prospects for hydrogen-enriched natural gas systems below 20 mol% H 2 while demonstrating fundamental limitations for dedicated hydrogen storage.

International Journal of Hydrogen EnergyVol. 284
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA), American University of Sharjah (AE)
Affordable and clean energy, Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.