Impact of adjuvant radiotherapy on survival outcomes in super-elderly patients with triple negative breast cancer: a population-based cohort study

Abstract Background and purpose Super elderly patients (aged ≥ 85 years) with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are markedly underrepresented in clinical trials. The survival benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in this population remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of adjuvant RT on overall survival (OS) in super-elderly patients with TNBC. We used population-based real-world data for this analysis. Materials and methods We identified patients aged ≥ 85 years with TNBC from 2018 to 2021 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients were grouped by surgery alone or surgery plus adjuvant RT. We used 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) to balance baseline clinicopathologic and treatment variables. OS was assessed using Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test. We applied univariate and multivariate Cox models to find independent OS predictors. Analyses included all patients aged ≥ 85 years and a subgroup of those aged ≥ 90 years. Results A total of 838 patients aged ≥ 85 years were included, of whom 272 were nonagenarians. After PSM, 313 patients per group were analyzed in the ≥ 85-year cohort, and 77 patients per group in the ≥ 90-year cohort. Adjuvant RT was associated with improved OS in both age groups; however, these differences did not reach statistical significance (≥ 85 years: HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.50–1.02, p = 0.0645; ≥90 years HR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.27–1.02, p = 0.057). In multivariate analyses, receipt of adjuvant RT was independently associated with improved OS in both cohorts; however, this association may reflect residual confounding from unmeasured variables, and should not be interpreted as evidence of a causal treatment effect. Other factors independently associated with prognosis included T stage, N stage, tumor size, and metastasis status. Conclusions In super-elderly patients with TNBC, adjuvant RT did not lead to a statistically significant OS benefit in propensity score-matched analyses. This lack of significance contrasts with findings in multivariable models, where adjuvant RT was associated with improved OS. As these results are based on an observational design, the observed associations between adjuvant RT and OS improvement should be interpreted with caution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-026-04568-0
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of adjuvant radiotherapy on survival outcomes in super-elderly patients with triple negative breast cancer: a population-based cohort study

王大伟, 沈阳坤, Jinyun Wu, Qi Chen et al.
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Impact of adjuvant radiotherapy on survival outcomes in super-elderly patients with triple negative breast cancer: a population-based cohort study

王大伟, 沈阳坤, Jinyun Wu, Qi Chen, Xiangqian Zhao, Weiwei Huang, Chenxi Wang, Zhihua Feng
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background and purpose Super elderly patients (aged ≥ 85 years) with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) are markedly underrepresented in clinical trials. The survival benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in this population remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of adjuvant RT on overall survival (OS) in super-elderly patients with TNBC. We used population-based real-world data for this analysis. Materials and methods We identified patients aged ≥ 85 years with TNBC from 2018 to 2021 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients were grouped by surgery alone or surgery plus adjuvant RT. We used 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) to balance baseline clinicopathologic and treatment variables. OS was assessed using Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test. We applied univariate and multivariate Cox models to find independent OS predictors. Analyses included all patients aged ≥ 85 years and a subgroup of those aged ≥ 90 years. Results A total of 838 patients aged ≥ 85 years were included, of whom 272 were nonagenarians. After PSM, 313 patients per group were analyzed in the ≥ 85-year cohort, and 77 patients per group in the ≥ 90-year cohort. Adjuvant RT was associated with improved OS in both age groups; however, these differences did not reach statistical significance (≥ 85 years: HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.50–1.02, p = 0.0645; ≥90 years HR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.27–1.02, p = 0.057). In multivariate analyses, receipt of adjuvant RT was independently associated with improved OS in both cohorts; however, this association may reflect residual confounding from unmeasured variables, and should not be interpreted as evidence of a causal treatment effect. Other factors independently associated with prognosis included T stage, N stage, tumor size, and metastasis status. Conclusions In super-elderly patients with TNBC, adjuvant RT did not lead to a statistically significant OS benefit in propensity score-matched analyses. This lack of significance contrasts with findings in multivariable models, where adjuvant RT was associated with improved OS. As these results are based on an observational design, the observed associations between adjuvant RT and OS improvement should be interpreted with caution.

World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Fujian Normal University (CN), Fujian Medical University (CN), Fujian Provincial Cancer Hospital (CN)
Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, Wu Jieping Medical Foundation
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.