Improving Estimates of Spatially Distributed Agricultural Land Use Using Pesticide Data

Accurate, spatially resolved agricultural land-use data are essential for estimating water demand, evaluating agricultural production, and understanding long-term changes in managed landscapes. However, existing land-use datasets are often temporally discontinuous, particularly for historical periods, and remotely sensed classifications face persistent challenges distinguishing spectrally similar crop types, capturing sub-annual rotations, and separating active from abandoned plantings. We developed the California Pesticide Use Reporting Land-Use Estimator (CalPUR-LUE), which converts grower-reported pesticide-application records into annual estimates of land use by crop class and cropped acreage at approximately 1-square-mile resolution across California. CalPUR-LUE performance was evaluated for 2018 using complementary spatial, categorical, and quantitative comparisons with California Department of Water Resources (CADWR) remotely sensed land-use data and county-level agricultural economic reports. At the county-meridian-township-range-section (COMTRS) scale, CalPUR-LUE and CADWR acreage estimates showed substantial proportional agreement (log-transformed Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient = 0.77) with a mean proportional bias of −15%. Crop-class agreement was high when CalPUR-LUE identified agricultural activity, with user’s accuracy exceeding 83% for all evaluated crop classes. Overall categorical agreement was 67% (Cohen’s kappa = 0.56). Grain crop underestimation contributed substantially to disagreement; however, there is evidence of CADWR systematic overestimation of grain during 2016–2019. County-level agricultural reports further corroborated CalPUR-LUE estimates and, in several cases, aligned more closely with CalPUR-LUE than with CADWR. These results demonstrate that pesticide-use reporting provides an independent and complementary source of agricultural land-use information that can corroborate contemporary estimates and reconstruct annual spatially distributed land use where historical data are limited.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/land15101960
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving Estimates of Spatially Distributed Agricultural Land Use Using Pesticide Data

S. Voss, Wesley R. Henson
Land
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
article

Improving Estimates of Spatially Distributed Agricultural Land Use Using Pesticide Data

S. Voss, Wesley R. Henson
article en

Abstract

Accurate, spatially resolved agricultural land-use data are essential for estimating water demand, evaluating agricultural production, and understanding long-term changes in managed landscapes. However, existing land-use datasets are often temporally discontinuous, particularly for historical periods, and remotely sensed classifications face persistent challenges distinguishing spectrally similar crop types, capturing sub-annual rotations, and separating active from abandoned plantings. We developed the California Pesticide Use Reporting Land-Use Estimator (CalPUR-LUE), which converts grower-reported pesticide-application records into annual estimates of land use by crop class and cropped acreage at approximately 1-square-mile resolution across California. CalPUR-LUE performance was evaluated for 2018 using complementary spatial, categorical, and quantitative comparisons with California Department of Water Resources (CADWR) remotely sensed land-use data and county-level agricultural economic reports. At the county-meridian-township-range-section (COMTRS) scale, CalPUR-LUE and CADWR acreage estimates showed substantial proportional agreement (log-transformed Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient = 0.77) with a mean proportional bias of −15%. Crop-class agreement was high when CalPUR-LUE identified agricultural activity, with user’s accuracy exceeding 83% for all evaluated crop classes. Overall categorical agreement was 67% (Cohen’s kappa = 0.56). Grain crop underestimation contributed substantially to disagreement; however, there is evidence of CADWR systematic overestimation of grain during 2016–2019. County-level agricultural reports further corroborated CalPUR-LUE estimates and, in several cases, aligned more closely with CalPUR-LUE than with CADWR. These results demonstrate that pesticide-use reporting provides an independent and complementary source of agricultural land-use information that can corroborate contemporary estimates and reconstruct annual spatially distributed land use where historical data are limited.

LandVol. 15(10)
United States Geological Survey (US)
Department of Water Resources
Life on land, Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.