Contractual Absolution: A Legal-Economic Framework Restricting Extra-Contractual Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in State-Subsidized Enterprises

Contemporary political economy frequently imposes open-ended Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) demands on private firms that receive state subsidies, public grants, or regulatory concessions. This paper establishes the legal-economic doctrine of Contractual Absolution. We argue that when a private enterprise enters into a bilateral subsidy agreement with the state and fulfills its explicitly stipulated Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)—such as job creation targets, capital expenditure quotas, or technological benchmarks—its legal and moral obligations to the state are fully discharged. Imposing extra-contractual social expectations post hoc violates administrative principles of non-arbitrariness, increases regulatory risk, and enables state institutions to shift public policy failures onto private balance sheets. By integrating Transaction Cost Economics and the Administrative Principle of Prohibition of Improper Coupling, this framework establishes that strict contractual performance grants complete immunity from extralegal moral demands, reclaiming transaction realism in state-firm governance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23355641
Primary Topic
Legal and Constitutional Studies
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Contractual Absolution: A Legal-Economic Framework Restricting Extra-Contractual Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in State-Subsidized Enterprises

Min Jinseong
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Legal and Constitutional Studies
preprint

Contractual Absolution: A Legal-Economic Framework Restricting Extra-Contractual Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in State-Subsidized Enterprises

Min Jinseong
preprint en

Abstract

Contemporary political economy frequently imposes open-ended Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) demands on private firms that receive state subsidies, public grants, or regulatory concessions. This paper establishes the legal-economic doctrine of Contractual Absolution. We argue that when a private enterprise enters into a bilateral subsidy agreement with the state and fulfills its explicitly stipulated Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)—such as job creation targets, capital expenditure quotas, or technological benchmarks—its legal and moral obligations to the state are fully discharged. Imposing extra-contractual social expectations post hoc violates administrative principles of non-arbitrariness, increases regulatory risk, and enables state institutions to shift public policy failures onto private balance sheets. By integrating Transaction Cost Economics and the Administrative Principle of Prohibition of Improper Coupling, this framework establishes that strict contractual performance grants complete immunity from extralegal moral demands, reclaiming transaction realism in state-firm governance.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Legal and Constitutional Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.