Effectiveness of rTMS vs. Pharmacotherapy in Late-Life Treatment-Resistant Depression: An Observational Study of Individual Participant Data From Two Randomized Clinical Trials

OBJECTIVE: The authors compared the effectiveness and tolerability of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) versus pharmacotherapy augmentation and switching strategies in older adults with late-life treatment-resistant depression (LL-TRD). METHODS: This observational study used individual participant data from 758 participants age 60 or older with LL-TRD from two randomized controlled trials: an rTMS trial of once-daily bilateral treatment for 4-6 weeks, and a pharmacotherapy trial comparing aripiprazole augmentation, bupropion augmentation, and switch to bupropion. Restriction, propensity score weighting, and regression adjustment were used to account for differences in trial design and eligibility criteria. The primary outcome was the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) 10 weeks after treatment initiation. RESULTS: After accounting for differences in participant characteristics, rTMS was associated with lower MADRS scores than aripiprazole augmentation (difference: 4.16 points, 95% CI=2.32, 6.00), bupropion augmentation (difference: 6.08 points, 95% CI=4.06, 8.09), and switch to bupropion (difference: 6.36 points, 95% CI=4.55, 8.17). rTMS was also associated with a higher response rate (defined as reduction ≥50% in MADRS score from baseline to week 10) than aripiprazole augmentation (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=3.83, 95% CI=1.08, 13.56), bupropion augmentation (AOR=4.87, 95% CI=1.15, 20.68), and switch to bupropion (AOR=4.02, 95% CI=1.12, 14.47). Participants who received rTMS were significantly more likely to experience headache than those who received pharmacotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that rTMS for LL-TRD may be superior to pharmacotherapy and supports the use of rTMS earlier in the treatment algorithms for LL-TRD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.20260398
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of rTMS vs. Pharmacotherapy in Late-Life Treatment-Resistant Depression: An Observational Study of Individual Participant Data From Two Randomized Clinical Trials

Jordan F. Karp, Daniel M. Blumberger, Benoit H. Mulsant, Eric J. Lenze et al.
American Journal of Psychiatry
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Effectiveness of rTMS vs. Pharmacotherapy in Late-Life Treatment-Resistant Depression: An Observational Study of Individual Participant Data From Two Randomized Clinical Trials

Jordan F. Karp, Daniel M. Blumberger, Benoit H. Mulsant, Eric J. Lenze, Taeho Greg Rhee, Helen Lavretsky, Tyler S. Kaster, Patrick J. Brown, Erin Adler
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors compared the effectiveness and tolerability of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) versus pharmacotherapy augmentation and switching strategies in older adults with late-life treatment-resistant depression (LL-TRD). METHODS: This observational study used individual participant data from 758 participants age 60 or older with LL-TRD from two randomized controlled trials: an rTMS trial of once-daily bilateral treatment for 4-6 weeks, and a pharmacotherapy trial comparing aripiprazole augmentation, bupropion augmentation, and switch to bupropion. Restriction, propensity score weighting, and regression adjustment were used to account for differences in trial design and eligibility criteria. The primary outcome was the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) 10 weeks after treatment initiation. RESULTS: After accounting for differences in participant characteristics, rTMS was associated with lower MADRS scores than aripiprazole augmentation (difference: 4.16 points, 95% CI=2.32, 6.00), bupropion augmentation (difference: 6.08 points, 95% CI=4.06, 8.09), and switch to bupropion (difference: 6.36 points, 95% CI=4.55, 8.17). rTMS was also associated with a higher response rate (defined as reduction ≥50% in MADRS score from baseline to week 10) than aripiprazole augmentation (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=3.83, 95% CI=1.08, 13.56), bupropion augmentation (AOR=4.87, 95% CI=1.15, 20.68), and switch to bupropion (AOR=4.02, 95% CI=1.12, 14.47). Participants who received rTMS were significantly more likely to experience headache than those who received pharmacotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that rTMS for LL-TRD may be superior to pharmacotherapy and supports the use of rTMS earlier in the treatment algorithms for LL-TRD.

American Journal of Psychiatry
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA), University of Arizona (US), University of Connecticut (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Toronto (CA), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre (CA), Yale University (US), New York State Psychiatric Institute, UConn Health (US), Columbia University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.