Integrating outdoor environments into health service delivery at residential care facilities for older adults

Abstract Background Outdoor environments may support everyday activities, person-centred care and rehabilitation, and health and well-being among older adults in residential care facilities (RCFs). However, how they can be integrated into routine health service delivery remains underexplored. This study aimed to explore how outdoor environments can support everyday activities and person-centred care and rehabilitation in RCFs, and to identify perceived benefits and barriers to their use in routine health service delivery. Methods A qualitative study was conducted using individual walking interviews with older adults and focus group walking interviews with care workers at three Swedish RCFs. Data were organised according to the model of four zones in contact with the outdoors: indoor environments with windows (Zone 1), transitional outdoor environments (Zone 2), gardens (Zone 3), and the surroundings (Zone 4). Everyday activities, care and rehabilitation were identified across the zones, together with perceived benefits and barriers. Practices were distinguished as either currently occurring or potential uses. Results All four zones offered opportunities for everyday activities, care and rehabilitation, including social interaction, recreation, physical activity, contact with nature, health conversations, and assessments. Perceived benefits included stimulation, enjoyment, social interaction, sensory experiences, and contact with nature. However, use was limited by physical, seasonal, organisational, informational, and social barriers. The findings indicate a gap between the opportunities outdoor environments offer and their integration into everyday routines. Conclusion Outdoor environments are a valuable but underutilized resource in RCFs. Their integration into routine health service delivery requires access to accessible environments, supportive organisational routines, and care workers with sufficient time, knowledge, and support. The identified practices across the four zones may provide practical inspiration for using outdoor environments in everyday activities and person-centred care and rehabilitation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-15852-w
Primary Topic
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating outdoor environments into health service delivery at residential care facilities for older adults

Göran Lindahl, Anna Ryan Bengtsson, Helle Wijk, Madeleine Liljegren
BMC Health Services Research
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
article

Integrating outdoor environments into health service delivery at residential care facilities for older adults

Göran Lindahl, Anna Ryan Bengtsson, Helle Wijk, Madeleine Liljegren
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Outdoor environments may support everyday activities, person-centred care and rehabilitation, and health and well-being among older adults in residential care facilities (RCFs). However, how they can be integrated into routine health service delivery remains underexplored. This study aimed to explore how outdoor environments can support everyday activities and person-centred care and rehabilitation in RCFs, and to identify perceived benefits and barriers to their use in routine health service delivery. Methods A qualitative study was conducted using individual walking interviews with older adults and focus group walking interviews with care workers at three Swedish RCFs. Data were organised according to the model of four zones in contact with the outdoors: indoor environments with windows (Zone 1), transitional outdoor environments (Zone 2), gardens (Zone 3), and the surroundings (Zone 4). Everyday activities, care and rehabilitation were identified across the zones, together with perceived benefits and barriers. Practices were distinguished as either currently occurring or potential uses. Results All four zones offered opportunities for everyday activities, care and rehabilitation, including social interaction, recreation, physical activity, contact with nature, health conversations, and assessments. Perceived benefits included stimulation, enjoyment, social interaction, sensory experiences, and contact with nature. However, use was limited by physical, seasonal, organisational, informational, and social barriers. The findings indicate a gap between the opportunities outdoor environments offer and their integration into everyday routines. Conclusion Outdoor environments are a valuable but underutilized resource in RCFs. Their integration into routine health service delivery requires access to accessible environments, supportive organisational routines, and care workers with sufficient time, knowledge, and support. The identified practices across the four zones may provide practical inspiration for using outdoor environments in everyday activities and person-centred care and rehabilitation.

BMC Health Services Research
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp (SE), Chalmers University of Technology (SE), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas, Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd, Familjen Kamprads Stiftelse
Good health and well-being, Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.