Stigma Consciousness, Coping Efficacy, and Engineering Persistence Intentions Among Underrepresented Students

Guided by Social Cognitive Career Theory, this study examined racial/ethnic stigma consciousness and efficacy for coping with educational barriers in relation to engineering persistence intentions among a U.S. sample of 458 engineering students from underrepresented racial/ethnic groups in engineering. SCCT suggests that contextual barriers may shape persistence through self-efficacy and outcome expectations, yet less is known about how the specific contextual variables of stigma-related appraisals and confidence in managing barriers operate within these processes for underrepresented engineering students. Structural equation modeling tested whether stigma consciousness and coping efficacy were associated with persistence intentions through engineering self-efficacy and positive and negative engineering outcome expectations. Stigma consciousness was associated with greater negative outcome expectations but showed no direct association with persistence intentions, and no indirect pathways were significant. In contrast, coping efficacy showed significant indirect associations with persistence intentions through self-efficacy, positive outcome expectations, and their serial pathway. Overall, the findings suggest that anticipated racialized treatment may be more closely associated with the perceived costs of engineering, whereas confidence in managing barriers may support the socio-cognitive beliefs more proximally associated with persistence intentions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Career Assessment
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10690727261498887
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stigma Consciousness, Coping Efficacy, and Engineering Persistence Intentions Among Underrepresented Students

Lisa Y. Flores, Bo Hyun Lee
Journal of Career Assessment
Career Development and Diversity
article

Stigma Consciousness, Coping Efficacy, and Engineering Persistence Intentions Among Underrepresented Students

Lisa Y. Flores, Bo Hyun Lee
article en

Abstract

Guided by Social Cognitive Career Theory, this study examined racial/ethnic stigma consciousness and efficacy for coping with educational barriers in relation to engineering persistence intentions among a U.S. sample of 458 engineering students from underrepresented racial/ethnic groups in engineering. SCCT suggests that contextual barriers may shape persistence through self-efficacy and outcome expectations, yet less is known about how the specific contextual variables of stigma-related appraisals and confidence in managing barriers operate within these processes for underrepresented engineering students. Structural equation modeling tested whether stigma consciousness and coping efficacy were associated with persistence intentions through engineering self-efficacy and positive and negative engineering outcome expectations. Stigma consciousness was associated with greater negative outcome expectations but showed no direct association with persistence intentions, and no indirect pathways were significant. In contrast, coping efficacy showed significant indirect associations with persistence intentions through self-efficacy, positive outcome expectations, and their serial pathway. Overall, the findings suggest that anticipated racialized treatment may be more closely associated with the perceived costs of engineering, whereas confidence in managing barriers may support the socio-cognitive beliefs more proximally associated with persistence intentions.

Journal of Career Assessment
Indiana University Bloomington (US), Indiana University (US), University of Missouri (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Career Development and Diversity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.