Evaluation of Image Derived CIELAB Colour Metrics for Machine Learning Classification of ICDAS Caries Severity: A Multimodal In Vitro Study

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether smartphone- and intraoral camera-derived CIELAB parameters reproduce spectrophotometric colour variation across ICDAS defined occlusal caries severity, agree with spectrophotometric measurements, and support machine learning classification and cross-modality transfer. Methods: A total of 298 extracted posterior teeth were classified as sound (ICDAS 0), initial (ICDAS 1–2), or moderate (ICDAS 3–4) lesions. Spectrophotometric measurements were obtained from five predefined occlusal sites per tooth. Each tooth was also imaged using a smartphone and intraoral camera under standardised conditions, and five corresponding regions of interest were analysed for image-derived CIELAB values. CIELAB patterns and agreement were assessed using Linear Mixed-Effects models, Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs), and Bland–Altman analysis. Nineteen tooth-level colour and spatial variation features were evaluated using five classifiers with stratified fivefold tooth-level cross-validation and identical fold assignments across modalities. Cross-modality transfer was assessed using spectrophotometer-trained models applied to aligned image-derived features. Results: Spectrophotometry showed the most consistent severity-related decrease in L* and increases in a* and b*. Smartphone measurements broadly reproduced the L* pattern and differentiated severity through a*, whereas intraoral cameras showed limited separation for L* and b*. Agreement was device- and coordinate-dependent; the highest ICCs were observed for smartphone L* (0.785) and intraoral camera a* (0.844), while systematic bias and wide limits of agreement indicated non-interchangeability. Smartphone-derived features achieved the highest balanced accuracy (0.836–0.918), followed by the intraoral camera (0.639–0.664) and spectrophotometry (0.443–0.552). Cross-modality transfer remained partial, with prediction agreement of 54.0–74.5% (k = 0.263–0.541). Conclusions: Image-derived CIELAB features captured lesion-related colour information but were not directly interchangeable with spectrophotometry. Image derived features performed best when the model was trained and tested using data from the same measurement method. Cross-device generalisability across different camera systems remains to be established.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oral
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/oral6050138
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Image Derived CIELAB Colour Metrics for Machine Learning Classification of ICDAS Caries Severity: A Multimodal In Vitro Study

James Dudley, Farah Rashid
Oral
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

Evaluation of Image Derived CIELAB Colour Metrics for Machine Learning Classification of ICDAS Caries Severity: A Multimodal In Vitro Study

James Dudley, Farah Rashid
article en

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether smartphone- and intraoral camera-derived CIELAB parameters reproduce spectrophotometric colour variation across ICDAS defined occlusal caries severity, agree with spectrophotometric measurements, and support machine learning classification and cross-modality transfer. Methods: A total of 298 extracted posterior teeth were classified as sound (ICDAS 0), initial (ICDAS 1–2), or moderate (ICDAS 3–4) lesions. Spectrophotometric measurements were obtained from five predefined occlusal sites per tooth. Each tooth was also imaged using a smartphone and intraoral camera under standardised conditions, and five corresponding regions of interest were analysed for image-derived CIELAB values. CIELAB patterns and agreement were assessed using Linear Mixed-Effects models, Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs), and Bland–Altman analysis. Nineteen tooth-level colour and spatial variation features were evaluated using five classifiers with stratified fivefold tooth-level cross-validation and identical fold assignments across modalities. Cross-modality transfer was assessed using spectrophotometer-trained models applied to aligned image-derived features. Results: Spectrophotometry showed the most consistent severity-related decrease in L* and increases in a* and b*. Smartphone measurements broadly reproduced the L* pattern and differentiated severity through a*, whereas intraoral cameras showed limited separation for L* and b*. Agreement was device- and coordinate-dependent; the highest ICCs were observed for smartphone L* (0.785) and intraoral camera a* (0.844), while systematic bias and wide limits of agreement indicated non-interchangeability. Smartphone-derived features achieved the highest balanced accuracy (0.836–0.918), followed by the intraoral camera (0.639–0.664) and spectrophotometry (0.443–0.552). Cross-modality transfer remained partial, with prediction agreement of 54.0–74.5% (k = 0.263–0.541). Conclusions: Image-derived CIELAB features captured lesion-related colour information but were not directly interchangeable with spectrophotometry. Image derived features performed best when the model was trained and tested using data from the same measurement method. Cross-device generalisability across different camera systems remains to be established.

OralVol. 6(5)
The University of Adelaide (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.