Toward a Multidimensional Understanding of Evidence About Wellbeing in Education

Calls for evidence-based practice in wellbeing in education have expanded rapidly across research, policy and professional discourse. Yet the concept of evidence in this field often remains under-theorised and inconsistently applied. Wellbeing in education is a complex and multidisciplinary domain, informed by psychology, education, sociology, public health and philosophy and encompassing outcomes, lived experiences, relationships and contextual conditions. As a result, narrow hierarchies of evidence borrowed from medical or interventionist traditions may be insufficient for capturing the complexity of educational wellbeing. This conceptual article develops a Multidimensional Evidence Framework for understanding evidence about wellbeing in education. Drawing on a critical realist and pragmatic pluralist theoretical frame, this article proposes that robust evidence in this field includes descriptive, causal, contextual and implementation, and experiential and interpretive forms of evidence, considered through a cross-cutting equity and ethical lens. It further distinguishes between evidence about wellbeing, evidence for wellbeing practice and evidence of wellbeing impact. A Multidimensional Evidence Framework is proposed to support more rigorous and conceptually coherent research, policy and practice by integrating these complementary evidence domains with the questions of evidence of what, for whom, and for what purpose.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16101711
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward a Multidimensional Understanding of Evidence About Wellbeing in Education

Claire Philp-Clark, Kristina Turner, Kathryn Ambrose, Elise Hunkin et al.
Education Sciences
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
article

Toward a Multidimensional Understanding of Evidence About Wellbeing in Education

Claire Philp-Clark, Kristina Turner, Kathryn Ambrose, Elise Hunkin, Laura McFarland
article en

Abstract

Calls for evidence-based practice in wellbeing in education have expanded rapidly across research, policy and professional discourse. Yet the concept of evidence in this field often remains under-theorised and inconsistently applied. Wellbeing in education is a complex and multidisciplinary domain, informed by psychology, education, sociology, public health and philosophy and encompassing outcomes, lived experiences, relationships and contextual conditions. As a result, narrow hierarchies of evidence borrowed from medical or interventionist traditions may be insufficient for capturing the complexity of educational wellbeing. This conceptual article develops a Multidimensional Evidence Framework for understanding evidence about wellbeing in education. Drawing on a critical realist and pragmatic pluralist theoretical frame, this article proposes that robust evidence in this field includes descriptive, causal, contextual and implementation, and experiential and interpretive forms of evidence, considered through a cross-cutting equity and ethical lens. It further distinguishes between evidence about wellbeing, evidence for wellbeing practice and evidence of wellbeing impact. A Multidimensional Evidence Framework is proposed to support more rigorous and conceptually coherent research, policy and practice by integrating these complementary evidence domains with the questions of evidence of what, for whom, and for what purpose.

Education SciencesVol. 16(10)
La Trobe University (AU)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.