Phosphorus drawdown management reduced soil phosphorus and edge-of-field phosphorus concentrations

Phosphorus (P) from historic P applications stored in agricultural soils can be drawn down by harvesting crops without fully replacing harvested P with P fertilizer, thereby potentially reducing a source of P loss to surface waterways that impairs water quality. Soil P drawdown research has typically consisted of small plot studies, and the applicability of these findings to the field scale remains uncertain. Additionally, soil P drawdown rate studies typically do not quantify the potential water quality benefits. In this study, soil P drawdown rates and edge-of-field P concentrations were measured for 13 years on two commercially farmed crop fields in Ohio with initial average soil test P (STP) measured by Mehlich-3 of 450 and 530 mg kg−1 (0 to 20 cm depth). Drawdown management resulted in declines in soil P in both fields that were fit with exponential decay functions that estimated soil P drawdown rates at 5% per year for STP and 4% per year for water-extractable P (WEP). Soil P drawdown rates were similar at 0 to 5, 5 to 15, and 15 to 30 cm depths but somewhat greater for the 30 to 50 cm depth. Water quality measurements indicated that annual flow-weighted dissolved reactive P (DRP) and total P (TP) concentrations trended down for both surface runoff and tile drainage water. In each field, one of the four combinations of loss pathway and P form had statistically significant linear trends: DRP declined by 0.07 mg L−1 y−1 in tile drainage from one field, and TP in surface runoff declined by 0.17 mg L−1 y−1 from the other field. These results clearly show that commercial crop production without P fertilization resulted in significant reductions in soil P concentrations that were in turn reflected in edge-of-field P concentration reductions. However, the annual rates of change in both soil and edge-of-field P concentrations were relatively small, indicating that decades would be required to meet soil P and water quality goals through drawdown alone on fields with elevated soil P.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00224561.2026.2722602
Primary Topic
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phosphorus drawdown management reduced soil phosphorus and edge-of-field phosphorus concentrations

Greg LaBarge, Kevin W. King, William Robert Osterholz, Mark R. Williams
Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
article

Phosphorus drawdown management reduced soil phosphorus and edge-of-field phosphorus concentrations

Greg LaBarge, Kevin W. King, William Robert Osterholz, Mark R. Williams
article en

Abstract

Phosphorus (P) from historic P applications stored in agricultural soils can be drawn down by harvesting crops without fully replacing harvested P with P fertilizer, thereby potentially reducing a source of P loss to surface waterways that impairs water quality. Soil P drawdown research has typically consisted of small plot studies, and the applicability of these findings to the field scale remains uncertain. Additionally, soil P drawdown rate studies typically do not quantify the potential water quality benefits. In this study, soil P drawdown rates and edge-of-field P concentrations were measured for 13 years on two commercially farmed crop fields in Ohio with initial average soil test P (STP) measured by Mehlich-3 of 450 and 530 mg kg−1 (0 to 20 cm depth). Drawdown management resulted in declines in soil P in both fields that were fit with exponential decay functions that estimated soil P drawdown rates at 5% per year for STP and 4% per year for water-extractable P (WEP). Soil P drawdown rates were similar at 0 to 5, 5 to 15, and 15 to 30 cm depths but somewhat greater for the 30 to 50 cm depth. Water quality measurements indicated that annual flow-weighted dissolved reactive P (DRP) and total P (TP) concentrations trended down for both surface runoff and tile drainage water. In each field, one of the four combinations of loss pathway and P form had statistically significant linear trends: DRP declined by 0.07 mg L−1 y−1 in tile drainage from one field, and TP in surface runoff declined by 0.17 mg L−1 y−1 from the other field. These results clearly show that commercial crop production without P fertilization resulted in significant reductions in soil P concentrations that were in turn reflected in edge-of-field P concentration reductions. However, the annual rates of change in both soil and edge-of-field P concentrations were relatively small, indicating that decades would be required to meet soil P and water quality goals through drawdown alone on fields with elevated soil P.

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation
Agricultural Research Service (US), National Soil Erosion Research Laboratory (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Clean water and sanitation, Zero hunger, Life on land
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.