Medical Decision‐Making Capacity in Early‐Stage Alzheimer Patients: Comparison With Healthy Controls and Benefit of Assistive Information

BACKGROUND: Early-stage Alzheimer Disease (AD) may lead to restricted decision-making capacity and without standardized instruments, there is great variability in determining patients' ability to give consent. This study aimed to assess decision-making capacity of AD patients in comparison to a healthy control group and investigated the usefulness of visual aids. METHODS: A group of 30 ad patients and 30 healthy controls were compared using the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T). Additionally, we implemented a modified version of the MacCAT-T with visual aids. RESULTS: Results revealed a significant difference in the MacCAT-T domain of Understanding between the AD and control group after adjustment for age, sex, and education. No significant differences were found for Appreciation, Reasoning, or Expression of Choice. Adding visual aids led to no significant improvements. CONCLUSIONS: Standardized assessments can be valuable tools for determining the decision-making capacity of patients with early-stage AD. The efficacy of visual aids should be further investigated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychogeriatrics
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/psyg.70227
Primary Topic
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Medical Decision‐Making Capacity in Early‐Stage Alzheimer Patients: Comparison With Healthy Controls and Benefit of Assistive Information

Vasilija Rolfes, Heiner Fangerau, Martin Haupt, Dilara Aylin Felice Vossberg
Psychogeriatrics
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
article

Medical Decision‐Making Capacity in Early‐Stage Alzheimer Patients: Comparison With Healthy Controls and Benefit of Assistive Information

Vasilija Rolfes, Heiner Fangerau, Martin Haupt, Dilara Aylin Felice Vossberg
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early-stage Alzheimer Disease (AD) may lead to restricted decision-making capacity and without standardized instruments, there is great variability in determining patients' ability to give consent. This study aimed to assess decision-making capacity of AD patients in comparison to a healthy control group and investigated the usefulness of visual aids. METHODS: A group of 30 ad patients and 30 healthy controls were compared using the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T). Additionally, we implemented a modified version of the MacCAT-T with visual aids. RESULTS: Results revealed a significant difference in the MacCAT-T domain of Understanding between the AD and control group after adjustment for age, sex, and education. No significant differences were found for Appreciation, Reasoning, or Expression of Choice. Adding visual aids led to no significant improvements. CONCLUSIONS: Standardized assessments can be valuable tools for determining the decision-making capacity of patients with early-stage AD. The efficacy of visual aids should be further investigated.

PsychogeriatricsVol. 26(6)
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Alzheimer Society, Deutsche Alzheimer Gesellschaft
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.