Localiser-Based Software-Assisted Patient Positioning in Chest CT: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

Background/Objectives: Vertical off-centring in chest CT impairs bowtie-filter beam-hardening correction, degrading noise uniformity and image quality. iCentering derives the patient’s geometric centre from a single posteroanterior localiser and automatically adjusts table height. This study aimed to evaluate whether iCentering reduces off-centring distance (OCD) and improves image quality versus manual positioning in chest CT, and to investigate correlations between OCD and noise characteristics. Methods: In this retrospective, single-centre study, 192 propensity score-matched pairs from 423 adults undergoing non-contrast chest CT were analysed. OCD, objective image quality (standard deviation (SD), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), figure of merit (FOM)), noise distribution ratio (NDRA-P), and radiation dose indices were measured. Paired comparisons employed t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and effect sizes reported. Directionally stratified Spearman correlation and multivariable regression examined OCD–noise associations. Results: Intra- and inter-observer reliability was good to excellent (ICC 0.87–0.99 for OCD; 0.75–0.97 for most regions of interest). iCentering moved median OCD closer to zero at all levels (Level 1: −7.25 vs. −29.40 mm; Level 2: −1.45 vs. −22.00 mm; Level 3: 7.45 vs. −11.90 mm; all p < 0.001; r range: 0.76–0.77). Regarding image quality, SD decreased and SNR, CNR, and FOM increased at all levels (all p < 0.001), while NDRA-P approached 1.00 (p < 0.05). Radiation dose indices were unchanged (p > 0.05). OCD correlated with SD (|ρ| = 0.478 – 0.812, p < 0.001); regression confirmed independent associations in both strata (OCD < 0: β range: −0.068 to −0.079, R2 = 0.52–0.65; OCD > 0: β range: 0.056–0.078, R2 = 0.28–0.54), whereas the association between OCD and NDRA-P was weak. Conclusions: iCentering improves centring accuracy and objective image quality in chest CT, without increasing radiation exposure. Reduced OCD is independently associated with lower image noise, underscoring the value of precise centring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16203344
Primary Topic
Radiation Dose and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Localiser-Based Software-Assisted Patient Positioning in Chest CT: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

沈新南, Jianping Liu, Yiting Wang, Li Tao et al.
Diagnostics
Radiation Dose and Imaging
article

Localiser-Based Software-Assisted Patient Positioning in Chest CT: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

沈新南, Jianping Liu, Yiting Wang, Li Tao, Meiqi WANG, Zhiwei Zhang, YouHong Cao, Wen Li
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Vertical off-centring in chest CT impairs bowtie-filter beam-hardening correction, degrading noise uniformity and image quality. iCentering derives the patient’s geometric centre from a single posteroanterior localiser and automatically adjusts table height. This study aimed to evaluate whether iCentering reduces off-centring distance (OCD) and improves image quality versus manual positioning in chest CT, and to investigate correlations between OCD and noise characteristics. Methods: In this retrospective, single-centre study, 192 propensity score-matched pairs from 423 adults undergoing non-contrast chest CT were analysed. OCD, objective image quality (standard deviation (SD), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), figure of merit (FOM)), noise distribution ratio (NDRA-P), and radiation dose indices were measured. Paired comparisons employed t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and effect sizes reported. Directionally stratified Spearman correlation and multivariable regression examined OCD–noise associations. Results: Intra- and inter-observer reliability was good to excellent (ICC 0.87–0.99 for OCD; 0.75–0.97 for most regions of interest). iCentering moved median OCD closer to zero at all levels (Level 1: −7.25 vs. −29.40 mm; Level 2: −1.45 vs. −22.00 mm; Level 3: 7.45 vs. −11.90 mm; all p < 0.001; r range: 0.76–0.77). Regarding image quality, SD decreased and SNR, CNR, and FOM increased at all levels (all p < 0.001), while NDRA-P approached 1.00 (p < 0.05). Radiation dose indices were unchanged (p > 0.05). OCD correlated with SD (|ρ| = 0.478 – 0.812, p < 0.001); regression confirmed independent associations in both strata (OCD < 0: β range: −0.068 to −0.079, R2 = 0.52–0.65; OCD > 0: β range: 0.056–0.078, R2 = 0.28–0.54), whereas the association between OCD and NDRA-P was weak. Conclusions: iCentering improves centring accuracy and objective image quality in chest CT, without increasing radiation exposure. Reduced OCD is independently associated with lower image noise, underscoring the value of precise centring.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(20)
The Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (CN)
Chongqing Municipal Education Commission
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Radiation Dose and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.