A Comparative Analysis of the Ankara Metropolitan Municipality and European Union Capital Cities Based on Strategic Planning Documents

This study compares Ankara Metropolitan Municipality’s 2020–2024 Strategic Plan with a documentary corpus covering all 27 European Union capitals and a September 2024 eligibility cutoff. Thematic document analysis examines carbon neutrality, circular economy, digital participation and sustainable mobility, alongside descriptive profiles of time perspective, purpose, governance and sustainability. Explicit evidence occurs in 15, 22, 10 and 24 capitals respectively; five, four, seven and three cases remain unassessable for the corresponding themes. Differences in documentary genre, territorial scale, completeness and adoption status limit comparisons to articulated planning priorities. A restricted nine-capital comparison of available adopted citywide strategies and development plans reports the same coding categories separately. Ankara combines detailed service indicators with environmental, participatory and social inclusion aims, supporting a view of operational and transformative orientations as coexisting features. Recommendations connect these aims to participatory budgeting, digital consultation, material recovery and mobility milestones. Source identities, planning levels and evidence locations are documented. Single-coder interpretation remains a limitation, and textual occurrence is not evidence of implementation success.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nous Academy Journal
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23304364
Primary Topic
Local Governance and Planning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of the Ankara Metropolitan Municipality and European Union Capital Cities Based on Strategic Planning Documents

İdris SARISOY, Furkan Arslan
Nous Academy Journal
Local Governance and Planning
article

A Comparative Analysis of the Ankara Metropolitan Municipality and European Union Capital Cities Based on Strategic Planning Documents

İdris SARISOY, Furkan Arslan
article en

Abstract

This study compares Ankara Metropolitan Municipality’s 2020–2024 Strategic Plan with a documentary corpus covering all 27 European Union capitals and a September 2024 eligibility cutoff. Thematic document analysis examines carbon neutrality, circular economy, digital participation and sustainable mobility, alongside descriptive profiles of time perspective, purpose, governance and sustainability. Explicit evidence occurs in 15, 22, 10 and 24 capitals respectively; five, four, seven and three cases remain unassessable for the corresponding themes. Differences in documentary genre, territorial scale, completeness and adoption status limit comparisons to articulated planning priorities. A restricted nine-capital comparison of available adopted citywide strategies and development plans reports the same coding categories separately. Ankara combines detailed service indicators with environmental, participatory and social inclusion aims, supporting a view of operational and transformative orientations as coexisting features. Recommendations connect these aims to participatory budgeting, digital consultation, material recovery and mobility milestones. Source identities, planning levels and evidence locations are documented. Single-coder interpretation remains a limitation, and textual occurrence is not evidence of implementation success.

Nous Academy Journal
Marmara University (TR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Local Governance and Planning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.