In Vitro Susceptibility and Molecular Docking of Echinocandins Against Clinical Dermatophyte Isolates: Implications for Resistant Dermatophytosis

Drug-resistant dermatophytosis has emerged as a global therapeutic challenge, underscoring the need for alternative antifungal strategies. Echinocandins, inhibitors of β-(1,3)-D-glucan synthase, demonstrate potent activity against Candida and Aspergillus but remain insufficiently characterized against dermatophytes. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of anidulafungin and caspofungin in a diverse clinical collection and examined their predicted interactions with β-(1,3)-D-glucan synthase. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed on 105 clinical isolates, including T. indotineae, T. mentagrophytes, T. rubrum, T. tonsurans, M. canis, N. gypsea, and T. violaceum, using CLSI M38-A3 broth microdilution. Minimum effective concentrations (MECs) for echinocandins and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for comparator agents were determined. Molecular docking simulations were conducted to characterize echinocandin interactions with β-(1,3)-D-glucan synthase. Statistical analyses used Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s tests. Both echinocandins showed significantly lower MEC/MIC distributions than all comparator antifungals after adjustment for multiple comparisons (all adjusted p < 0.001). Anidulafungin was more potent than caspofungin (GM MECs: 0.011 vs. 0.022 µg/mL; p < 0.001). Against terbinafine-resistant T. indotineae, MEC50 values were 0.008 µg/mL (anidulafungin) and 0.016 µg/mL (caspofungin), markedly outperforming terbinafine (MIC50 = 4 µg/mL). Docking analyses demonstrated species- and ligand-dependent predicted interaction patterns with β-(1,3)-D-glucan synthase, providing complementary structural context for the observed in vitro susceptibility profiles. This study extends prior in vitro observations by profiling two echinocandins against diverse clinical dermatophytes, including terbinafine-resistant T. indotineae. Docking analysis provides structural context but does not establish target engagement. Further preclinical studies are needed to confirm therapeutic relevance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Fungi
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jof12100769
Primary Topic
Nail Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In Vitro Susceptibility and Molecular Docking of Echinocandins Against Clinical Dermatophyte Isolates: Implications for Resistant Dermatophytosis

Javad Javidnia, Mahdi Abastabar, Mohsen Nosratabadi, Iman Haghani et al.
Journal of Fungi
Nail Diseases and Treatments
article

In Vitro Susceptibility and Molecular Docking of Echinocandins Against Clinical Dermatophyte Isolates: Implications for Resistant Dermatophytosis

Javad Javidnia, Mahdi Abastabar, Mohsen Nosratabadi, Iman Haghani, Milad Lagzian, Mohammad Taghi Hedayati, Narges Vaseghi, Tahereh Shokohi, Reza Valadan, Zahra Yahyazadeh, Hamid Badali, Jamshid Yazdani, Iman Nikjan
article en

Abstract

Drug-resistant dermatophytosis has emerged as a global therapeutic challenge, underscoring the need for alternative antifungal strategies. Echinocandins, inhibitors of β-(1,3)-D-glucan synthase, demonstrate potent activity against Candida and Aspergillus but remain insufficiently characterized against dermatophytes. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of anidulafungin and caspofungin in a diverse clinical collection and examined their predicted interactions with β-(1,3)-D-glucan synthase. Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed on 105 clinical isolates, including T. indotineae, T. mentagrophytes, T. rubrum, T. tonsurans, M. canis, N. gypsea, and T. violaceum, using CLSI M38-A3 broth microdilution. Minimum effective concentrations (MECs) for echinocandins and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for comparator agents were determined. Molecular docking simulations were conducted to characterize echinocandin interactions with β-(1,3)-D-glucan synthase. Statistical analyses used Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s tests. Both echinocandins showed significantly lower MEC/MIC distributions than all comparator antifungals after adjustment for multiple comparisons (all adjusted p < 0.001). Anidulafungin was more potent than caspofungin (GM MECs: 0.011 vs. 0.022 µg/mL; p < 0.001). Against terbinafine-resistant T. indotineae, MEC50 values were 0.008 µg/mL (anidulafungin) and 0.016 µg/mL (caspofungin), markedly outperforming terbinafine (MIC50 = 4 µg/mL). Docking analyses demonstrated species- and ligand-dependent predicted interaction patterns with β-(1,3)-D-glucan synthase, providing complementary structural context for the observed in vitro susceptibility profiles. This study extends prior in vitro observations by profiling two echinocandins against diverse clinical dermatophytes, including terbinafine-resistant T. indotineae. Docking analysis provides structural context but does not establish target engagement. Further preclinical studies are needed to confirm therapeutic relevance.

Journal of FungiVol. 12(10)
Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch (IR), University of Sistan and Baluchestan (IR), The University of Texas at San Antonio (US), Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Nail Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.