Techno-Economic Assessment of Integrating Renewable Power to Large Inductive Loads Under Power Compensation Schemes: A Case Study of Metropolitan Water Pumping Systems

Large inductive loads such as motors and pumps require balanced active and reactive power for their operation. There are two major approaches that are adopted to reduce energy consumption. The capacitor bank scheme (CBS) is mainly used for reactive power compensation, whereas solar power integration (SPI) is used mainly to reduce the burden on the grid while providing active power. However, significant aspects that may need precise quantitative assessment are active power, reactive power, and the power factor variations under the CBS and SPI schemes. This research study proposes an evaluate, quantify, and compare (EQC) framework for CBS and SPI schemes that will help industries to systematically opt for the efficient and cost-effective operation of large inductive loads. Under the EQC framework, detailed quantified trade-offs between active power, reactive power, and power factor corrections were found. It was found that without integrating renewable power, the active power and reactive power on the LV bus were 115 kW and 58.9 kVAR, respectively, compared to CBS, where reactive power was reduced to 34.9 kVAR. SPI approach with unity power factor reduced active power and reactive power to 34 kW and 59 kVAR, respectively. However, the power factor was reduced to 50.4% from 80% in CBS. While integrating solar power with a 90% power factor, the active power was reduced to 34 kW, and the reactive power was reduced to 20 kVAR with the power factor increasing to approx. 90%, proving the suitability of the SPI approach. To further assess the SPI approach in terms of economics, the feasibility analysis for SPI was conducted on HOMER PRO. The NPC reaches up to 1.13 million, which is 30% lower compared to grid supplies. The operation capital cost for solar PV power is USD 63,453. The operational cost is 34% compared to the grid. One of the important parameters is the levelized cost of energy (LCOE). The cost of energy for the grid-based system is set at 0.210 cents, whereas for solar power, the LCOE is set at 0.126 cents, which is 40% less compared to the grid.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19204859
Primary Topic
Power Quality and Harmonics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Techno-Economic Assessment of Integrating Renewable Power to Large Inductive Loads Under Power Compensation Schemes: A Case Study of Metropolitan Water Pumping Systems

Faisal Masood, Fawad Azeem, Zulfiqar Ali Memon, Husnain Ghaffar
Energies
Power Quality and Harmonics
article

Techno-Economic Assessment of Integrating Renewable Power to Large Inductive Loads Under Power Compensation Schemes: A Case Study of Metropolitan Water Pumping Systems

Faisal Masood, Fawad Azeem, Zulfiqar Ali Memon, Husnain Ghaffar
article en

Abstract

Large inductive loads such as motors and pumps require balanced active and reactive power for their operation. There are two major approaches that are adopted to reduce energy consumption. The capacitor bank scheme (CBS) is mainly used for reactive power compensation, whereas solar power integration (SPI) is used mainly to reduce the burden on the grid while providing active power. However, significant aspects that may need precise quantitative assessment are active power, reactive power, and the power factor variations under the CBS and SPI schemes. This research study proposes an evaluate, quantify, and compare (EQC) framework for CBS and SPI schemes that will help industries to systematically opt for the efficient and cost-effective operation of large inductive loads. Under the EQC framework, detailed quantified trade-offs between active power, reactive power, and power factor corrections were found. It was found that without integrating renewable power, the active power and reactive power on the LV bus were 115 kW and 58.9 kVAR, respectively, compared to CBS, where reactive power was reduced to 34.9 kVAR. SPI approach with unity power factor reduced active power and reactive power to 34 kW and 59 kVAR, respectively. However, the power factor was reduced to 50.4% from 80% in CBS. While integrating solar power with a 90% power factor, the active power was reduced to 34 kW, and the reactive power was reduced to 20 kVAR with the power factor increasing to approx. 90%, proving the suitability of the SPI approach. To further assess the SPI approach in terms of economics, the feasibility analysis for SPI was conducted on HOMER PRO. The NPC reaches up to 1.13 million, which is 30% lower compared to grid supplies. The operation capital cost for solar PV power is USD 63,453. The operational cost is 34% compared to the grid. One of the important parameters is the levelized cost of energy (LCOE). The cost of energy for the grid-based system is set at 0.210 cents, whereas for solar power, the LCOE is set at 0.126 cents, which is 40% less compared to the grid.

EnergiesVol. 19(20)
COMSATS University Islamabad (PK), Ajman University (AE)
Affordable and clean energy, Industry, innovation and infrastructure, Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Power Quality and Harmonics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.