Thermomechanical Comparison of PET-G and TC-85 Orthodontic Aligner Materials

This study combined thermomechanical characterisation with finite element analysis to compare polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PET-G) and Tera Harz TC-85 orthodontic aligner materials. Tensile properties were evaluated at 23, 37, 55 and 80 °C, with five observations per material and temperature. Identical full-arch geometries with a nominal thickness of 0.75 mm were subjected to 600 N compression at 300 K, heating under maintained load to 352 K and cooling to 310 K. At 23 °C, tensile moduli were 1396.4 ± 44.9 MPa for PET-G and 675.4 ± 21.2 MPa for TC-85. Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) loss-tangent maxima occurred at sampled temperatures of 80 and 45 °C. Tensile and DMA moduli diverged at elevated temperatures. Initial maximum effective strains were 0.165 and 0.196, and medium-to-fine mesh changes were 1.78% and 2.61%. TC-85 showed a greater reduction in maximum strain following heating to 78.85 °C. Recovery benchmark values at 60 min were 63.3% for PET-G and 92.5% for TC-85; paired-series metrics quantified curve agreement. PET-G exhibited higher tensile stiffness, whereas TC-85 exhibited greater benchmark recovery and a larger thermal-stage strain reduction. The high-temperature endpoint represents ex vivo activation. Constitutive and experimental limitations constrain extrapolation to clinical appliance performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymers
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18202517
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thermomechanical Comparison of PET-G and TC-85 Orthodontic Aligner Materials

Gökhan Serhat Duran, Serkan Görgülü, Melis Büşra Aşkın
Polymers
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Thermomechanical Comparison of PET-G and TC-85 Orthodontic Aligner Materials

Gökhan Serhat Duran, Serkan Görgülü, Melis Büşra Aşkın
article en

Abstract

This study combined thermomechanical characterisation with finite element analysis to compare polyethylene terephthalate glycol (PET-G) and Tera Harz TC-85 orthodontic aligner materials. Tensile properties were evaluated at 23, 37, 55 and 80 °C, with five observations per material and temperature. Identical full-arch geometries with a nominal thickness of 0.75 mm were subjected to 600 N compression at 300 K, heating under maintained load to 352 K and cooling to 310 K. At 23 °C, tensile moduli were 1396.4 ± 44.9 MPa for PET-G and 675.4 ± 21.2 MPa for TC-85. Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) loss-tangent maxima occurred at sampled temperatures of 80 and 45 °C. Tensile and DMA moduli diverged at elevated temperatures. Initial maximum effective strains were 0.165 and 0.196, and medium-to-fine mesh changes were 1.78% and 2.61%. TC-85 showed a greater reduction in maximum strain following heating to 78.85 °C. Recovery benchmark values at 60 min were 63.3% for PET-G and 92.5% for TC-85; paired-series metrics quantified curve agreement. PET-G exhibited higher tensile stiffness, whereas TC-85 exhibited greater benchmark recovery and a larger thermal-stage strain reduction. The high-temperature endpoint represents ex vivo activation. Constitutive and experimental limitations constrain extrapolation to clinical appliance performance.

PolymersVol. 18(20)
Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi (TR), Yozgat Bozok Üniversitesi (TR), Gülhane Askerî Tıp Akademisi (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), University of Health Sciences Antigua (AG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.