Differences in patients' health indicator measurements between traditional care and team-based care in primary healthcare: a quantitative retrospective longitudinal cohort study

Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine changes in patient health indicator measurements in Finnish primary healthcare by comparing traditional care in 2017 with team-based care in 2022. Design/methodology/approach The study was a quantitative retrospective longitudinal cohort study using register data from patients' electronic health records, including low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels, and blood pressure measurements. In this study, we compared patients in two groups: the traditional care group and the team-based care group. These groups were compared at measurement periods: first period of 2–6 months, second period of >6–10 months, and third period of >10–14 months. Findings Statistically significant differences were noted between the team-based care and traditional care groups over time in LDL (p = 0.005) and HbA1c (p < 0.0001). Although team-based care showed a significant change from baseline in systolic blood pressure during the second period, no between-group differences were observed over time. Originality/value Limited studies have been published to comparing traditional care with team-based care, both internationally and in Finland. Our study showed that team-based care may support the management of patients whose clinical monitoring includes LDL and HbA1c values and therefore have positive impacts on treatment outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Integrated Care
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jica-03-2026-0041
Primary Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in patients' health indicator measurements between traditional care and team-based care in primary healthcare: a quantitative retrospective longitudinal cohort study

Minna Stolt, Marita Hannele Koivunen, Marjo Mäkelä, Tiina Sluyts et al.
Journal of Integrated Care
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
article

Differences in patients' health indicator measurements between traditional care and team-based care in primary healthcare: a quantitative retrospective longitudinal cohort study

Minna Stolt, Marita Hannele Koivunen, Marjo Mäkelä, Tiina Sluyts, Henna Tapani, Palander Jenni
article en

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to examine changes in patient health indicator measurements in Finnish primary healthcare by comparing traditional care in 2017 with team-based care in 2022. Design/methodology/approach The study was a quantitative retrospective longitudinal cohort study using register data from patients' electronic health records, including low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels, and blood pressure measurements. In this study, we compared patients in two groups: the traditional care group and the team-based care group. These groups were compared at measurement periods: first period of 2–6 months, second period of >6–10 months, and third period of >10–14 months. Findings Statistically significant differences were noted between the team-based care and traditional care groups over time in LDL (p = 0.005) and HbA1c (p < 0.0001). Although team-based care showed a significant change from baseline in systolic blood pressure during the second period, no between-group differences were observed over time. Originality/value Limited studies have been published to comparing traditional care with team-based care, both internationally and in Finland. Our study showed that team-based care may support the management of patients whose clinical monitoring includes LDL and HbA1c values and therefore have positive impacts on treatment outcomes.

Journal of Integrated CareVol. 34(5)
University of Turku (FI)
European Commission
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.