Transforming Multidisciplinary Palliative Radiotherapy Delivery Through Advanced Practice Radiographers: Opportunities, Evidence and Future Directions

Palliative radiotherapy (RT) is frequently delivered in time-sensitive clinical settings and requires rapid, patient-centred decision-making while balancing symptom burden, prognosis, comorbidities, treatment burden, and individual goals of care. Increasing demand for palliative RT and workforce pressures have stimulated the development of advanced practice models involving radiation therapy professionals. This review examines the evolving role of Advanced Practice Radiographers (APRs) in palliative RT, with particular attention to clinical practice, leadership, education, and research. APR-led models described internationally include patient assessment, treatment decision-making, treatment planning, treatment delivery, symptom and toxicity management, prescribing, follow-up, and coordination of supportive and palliative care. The available evidence indicates that appropriately trained APRs can undertake selected activities traditionally performed by medical staff within defined competency and governance frameworks, with reported benefits including increased service capacity, reduced waiting times, streamlined treatment pathways, continuity of care, and positive patient experience. However, the evidence base remains heterogeneous and is predominantly focused on feasibility, acceptability, workforce capacity, and service-level outcomes. Evidence regarding patient-centred outcomes, including symptom control, quality of life, treatment burden, safety, and concordance with patients’ goals of care, remains limited. Considerable international variation also exists in education, regulation, scope of practice, professional autonomy, and organisational support. Advanced practice radiography therefore represents a developing model for delivering palliative RT, but further prospective evaluation is needed to establish its impact on patient, clinical, service, workforce, and health-system outcomes, and to identify the organisational and governance conditions required for sustainable implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiation
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/radiation6040039
Primary Topic
Nursing Roles and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transforming Multidisciplinary Palliative Radiotherapy Delivery Through Advanced Practice Radiographers: Opportunities, Evidence and Future Directions

Eva Oldenburger, Rachael Wooder, M. Bewley, Agata Rembielak et al.
Radiation
Nursing Roles and Practices
article

Transforming Multidisciplinary Palliative Radiotherapy Delivery Through Advanced Practice Radiographers: Opportunities, Evidence and Future Directions

Eva Oldenburger, Rachael Wooder, M. Bewley, Agata Rembielak, Maria Kristina Vassiliou
article en

Abstract

Palliative radiotherapy (RT) is frequently delivered in time-sensitive clinical settings and requires rapid, patient-centred decision-making while balancing symptom burden, prognosis, comorbidities, treatment burden, and individual goals of care. Increasing demand for palliative RT and workforce pressures have stimulated the development of advanced practice models involving radiation therapy professionals. This review examines the evolving role of Advanced Practice Radiographers (APRs) in palliative RT, with particular attention to clinical practice, leadership, education, and research. APR-led models described internationally include patient assessment, treatment decision-making, treatment planning, treatment delivery, symptom and toxicity management, prescribing, follow-up, and coordination of supportive and palliative care. The available evidence indicates that appropriately trained APRs can undertake selected activities traditionally performed by medical staff within defined competency and governance frameworks, with reported benefits including increased service capacity, reduced waiting times, streamlined treatment pathways, continuity of care, and positive patient experience. However, the evidence base remains heterogeneous and is predominantly focused on feasibility, acceptability, workforce capacity, and service-level outcomes. Evidence regarding patient-centred outcomes, including symptom control, quality of life, treatment burden, safety, and concordance with patients’ goals of care, remains limited. Considerable international variation also exists in education, regulation, scope of practice, professional autonomy, and organisational support. Advanced practice radiography therefore represents a developing model for delivering palliative RT, but further prospective evaluation is needed to establish its impact on patient, clinical, service, workforce, and health-system outcomes, and to identify the organisational and governance conditions required for sustainable implementation.

RadiationVol. 6(4)
Leiden University Medical Center (NL), University of Manchester (GB), The Christie Hospital (GB), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Nursing Roles and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.