FORMAL VERSUS SUBSTANTIVE IFRS COMPLIANCE: A THREE-BLOCK DISCLOSURE MODEL BASED ON EVIDENCE FROM PUBLIC-INTEREST ENTITIES IN UZBEKISTAN

Uzbekistan has recently completed the institutional phase of its transition to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): a regulatory framework for public-interest entities (PIEs) was introduced in 2025, the first PIE register was published in 2026, and a programme to develop 32 national financial reporting standards is currently under way. This study examines whether formal adoption has been accompanied by substantive implementation. Drawing on the full texts of IFRS financial statements published by four joint-stock companies operating in four different industries on the national corporate disclosure portal, together with a comparison of financial statements prepared under national reporting formats and IFRS by a single entity for the same reporting year, the study identifies four principal disclosure gaps. First, the bases of presentation are not consistent across entities belonging to the same regulatory category. Second, the expected credit loss allowance required under IFRS 9 is quantified in only half of the financial statements examined, with the reported amounts differing by a factor of approximately 390. Third, a modified audit opinion is associated with the absence of fundamental internal control procedures rather than with complex accounting measurement judgements. Fourth, in one case, profit or loss and total comprehensive income indicate contrasting financial outcomes without the corresponding reconciling item being prominently disclosed. The study argues that these disclosure gaps should not be attributed solely to individual preparers but can be understood as a foreseeable consequence of template-driven approaches to preparing explanatory notes. Accordingly, a three-block disclosure model is proposed, with each block designed to address a distinct information need of the primary users identified in the IFRS Conceptual Framework. The paper also outlines policy implications for the ongoing national financial reporting standards development programme.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23364276
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FORMAL VERSUS SUBSTANTIVE IFRS COMPLIANCE: A THREE-BLOCK DISCLOSURE MODEL BASED ON EVIDENCE FROM PUBLIC-INTEREST ENTITIES IN UZBEKISTAN

Zunnunov Lazizkhon
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

FORMAL VERSUS SUBSTANTIVE IFRS COMPLIANCE: A THREE-BLOCK DISCLOSURE MODEL BASED ON EVIDENCE FROM PUBLIC-INTEREST ENTITIES IN UZBEKISTAN

Zunnunov Lazizkhon
article en

Abstract

Uzbekistan has recently completed the institutional phase of its transition to International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): a regulatory framework for public-interest entities (PIEs) was introduced in 2025, the first PIE register was published in 2026, and a programme to develop 32 national financial reporting standards is currently under way. This study examines whether formal adoption has been accompanied by substantive implementation. Drawing on the full texts of IFRS financial statements published by four joint-stock companies operating in four different industries on the national corporate disclosure portal, together with a comparison of financial statements prepared under national reporting formats and IFRS by a single entity for the same reporting year, the study identifies four principal disclosure gaps. First, the bases of presentation are not consistent across entities belonging to the same regulatory category. Second, the expected credit loss allowance required under IFRS 9 is quantified in only half of the financial statements examined, with the reported amounts differing by a factor of approximately 390. Third, a modified audit opinion is associated with the absence of fundamental internal control procedures rather than with complex accounting measurement judgements. Fourth, in one case, profit or loss and total comprehensive income indicate contrasting financial outcomes without the corresponding reconciling item being prominently disclosed. The study argues that these disclosure gaps should not be attributed solely to individual preparers but can be understood as a foreseeable consequence of template-driven approaches to preparing explanatory notes. Accordingly, a three-block disclosure model is proposed, with each block designed to address a distinct information need of the primary users identified in the IFRS Conceptual Framework. The paper also outlines policy implications for the ongoing national financial reporting standards development programme.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Tashkent State University of Economics (UZ)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.