A Comprehensive Review of Fault‐Current Limiter Technologies for Smart and Resilient Power Systems

ABSTRACT The transition toward inverter‐dominated, renewable‐rich power systems has significantly increased short‐circuit levels, often exceeding the interrupting capability of conventional protection. Fault‐current limiters (FCLs) have emerged as important technologies for mitigating these currents and supporting grid reliability. This article provides a comprehensive, system‐oriented review that bridges device‐level FCL characteristics with grid‐level requirements across alternating current, direct current (DC), and hybrid networks. It systematically categorizes and evaluates superconducting FCL, solid‐state FCL, and hybrid FCL technologies, detailing their operating principles, dynamic fault responses, and control strategies. A structured comparison framework is established to assess the trade‐offs among current‐limiting capability, response speed, steady‐state losses, cost, and technical maturity. In addition to device‐level classification, the review examines fault‐current behavior in modern grids by considering inverter‐limited fault currents (inverter‐based resource saturation), DC offset decay dynamics, and asymmetrical fault conditions using symmetrical components. The review also examines the coordination of FCLs with adaptive protection schemes and considers optimization approaches for FCL placement and sizing in converter‐dominated networks. The findings indicate that no single FCL technology is universally superior; optimal selection depends on specific operating constraints, fault characteristics, and voltage levels. Finally, the review highlights several areas that warrant further investigation, including standardized benchmarking, long‐term field validation, and improved integration with modern control architectures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Science & Engineering
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.70664
Primary Topic
Power Systems Fault Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comprehensive Review of Fault‐Current Limiter Technologies for Smart and Resilient Power Systems

Eslam Essam, Hilmy El-sayed Awad, A.M. Hamada, Walid R. Issa et al.
Energy Science & Engineering
Power Systems Fault Detection
article

A Comprehensive Review of Fault‐Current Limiter Technologies for Smart and Resilient Power Systems

Eslam Essam, Hilmy El-sayed Awad, A.M. Hamada, Walid R. Issa, Samia Abdel Fattah, Abdelrahman Farghly
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The transition toward inverter‐dominated, renewable‐rich power systems has significantly increased short‐circuit levels, often exceeding the interrupting capability of conventional protection. Fault‐current limiters (FCLs) have emerged as important technologies for mitigating these currents and supporting grid reliability. This article provides a comprehensive, system‐oriented review that bridges device‐level FCL characteristics with grid‐level requirements across alternating current, direct current (DC), and hybrid networks. It systematically categorizes and evaluates superconducting FCL, solid‐state FCL, and hybrid FCL technologies, detailing their operating principles, dynamic fault responses, and control strategies. A structured comparison framework is established to assess the trade‐offs among current‐limiting capability, response speed, steady‐state losses, cost, and technical maturity. In addition to device‐level classification, the review examines fault‐current behavior in modern grids by considering inverter‐limited fault currents (inverter‐based resource saturation), DC offset decay dynamics, and asymmetrical fault conditions using symmetrical components. The review also examines the coordination of FCLs with adaptive protection schemes and considers optimization approaches for FCL placement and sizing in converter‐dominated networks. The findings indicate that no single FCL technology is universally superior; optimal selection depends on specific operating constraints, fault characteristics, and voltage levels. Finally, the review highlights several areas that warrant further investigation, including standardized benchmarking, long‐term field validation, and improved integration with modern control architectures.

Energy Science & Engineering
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA), Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology (EG), Sheffield Hallam University (GB), Helwan University (EG), Alexandria University (EG)
Affordable and clean energy, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Power Systems Fault Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.