Systemically Important Banks and Loan Performance: Evidence from India

We examine whether designating banks as systemically important affects loan performance in an emerging-market setting where such banks are large domestic institutions and market imperfections make monitoring crucial for loan performance. Using loan-level data and the staggered designation of banks as Domestic Systemically Important Banks (DSIBs) in India, we find that loan performance deteriorates following DSIB designation. The evidence points to bank-level moral hazard as the underlying mechanism: DSIBs reduce postorigination monitoring and weaken loan recovery efforts. Borrowers respond accordingly, exhibiting poorer financial health and loan repayment, particularly on loans extended by DSIBs. This paper was accepted by Jan Bouwens, accounting. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2025.03238 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Science
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2025.03238
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systemically Important Banks and Loan Performance: Evidence from India

Nishant Kashyap, Sriniwas Mahapatro, Prasanna L. Tantri, Shashwat Agrawal
Management Science
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
article

Systemically Important Banks and Loan Performance: Evidence from India

Nishant Kashyap, Sriniwas Mahapatro, Prasanna L. Tantri, Shashwat Agrawal
article en

Abstract

We examine whether designating banks as systemically important affects loan performance in an emerging-market setting where such banks are large domestic institutions and market imperfections make monitoring crucial for loan performance. Using loan-level data and the staggered designation of banks as Domestic Systemically Important Banks (DSIBs) in India, we find that loan performance deteriorates following DSIB designation. The evidence points to bank-level moral hazard as the underlying mechanism: DSIBs reduce postorigination monitoring and weaken loan recovery efforts. Borrowers respond accordingly, exhibiting poorer financial health and loan repayment, particularly on loans extended by DSIBs. This paper was accepted by Jan Bouwens, accounting. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2025.03238 .

Management Science
Boston College (US), Indian School of Business (IN), Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad (IN), Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.