Tools Measuring Health Literacy in Critically Ill Patients and Their Caregivers: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVES: Health literacy, the ability to understand and use health information, is important for critically ill patients and their caregivers in the neonatal ICU (NICU), PICU, and adult ICU to make informed decisions and navigate complex care. This review aimed to identify and summarize tools used to assess health literacy in critically ill patients or their caregivers. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO through July 24, 2025. STUDY SELECTION: Included articles reported on tools to assess health literacy in critically ill patients or their caregivers. Two reviewers independently performed screening and data extraction. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent reviewers extracted data in Covidence. Data items included study characteristics (country in which the study was conducted, study funding, study setting) and health literacy tool characteristics (tool user, types of questions in the tool, method of tool administration, if the tool was created by the study team, and if a full version was available in the publication). DATA SYNTHESIS: We included 92 articles describing 84 health literacy tools. Tools measured: 1) topic-specific clinical knowledge (e.g., organ donation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; n = 24/84, 29%; NICU: n = 9; PICU: n = 1; ICU: n = 14); 2) ICU prognosis, diagnosis, and treatment (n = 23/84, 27%; NICU: 6; PICU: 3; ICU: n = 15); 3) neonatal and parenting (n = 13/84, 15%; all NICU); 4) general health literacy abilities (n = 11/84, 13%; NICU: n = 6; PICU: n = 2; ICU: n = 7); 5) information needs (n = 4/84, 5%; NICU: n = 1; PICU: n = 0; ICU: n = 3); 6) readiness for discharge (n = 3/84, 4%; all NICU); 7) decision-making (n = 3/84, 4%; all NICU); 8) health-related behaviors (n = 2/84, 2%; NICU: n = 1; ICU: n = 1); and 9) research participation (n = 1/84, 1%; NICU). CONCLUSIONS: Although several health literacy tools exist, they often focus on individual knowledge of specific aspects of ICU care, with less attention to how understanding is produced within the clinical context through interactions among patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers. This may limit their ability to reflect how health literacy functions in critical illness. Assessment of health literacy requires pairing the appropriate tools with interaction-focused approaches to guide communication and support informed decision-making in ICU settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000007382
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tools Measuring Health Literacy in Critically Ill Patients and Their Caregivers: A Scoping Review

Anmol Shahid, Henry T. Stelfox, Kirsten Marie Fiest, Karla D. Krewulak et al.
Critical Care Medicine
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Tools Measuring Health Literacy in Critically Ill Patients and Their Caregivers: A Scoping Review

Anmol Shahid, Henry T. Stelfox, Kirsten Marie Fiest, Karla D. Krewulak, Thérèse G. Poulin, Nina Carcamo Arakawa
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Health literacy, the ability to understand and use health information, is important for critically ill patients and their caregivers in the neonatal ICU (NICU), PICU, and adult ICU to make informed decisions and navigate complex care. This review aimed to identify and summarize tools used to assess health literacy in critically ill patients or their caregivers. DATA SOURCES: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO through July 24, 2025. STUDY SELECTION: Included articles reported on tools to assess health literacy in critically ill patients or their caregivers. Two reviewers independently performed screening and data extraction. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent reviewers extracted data in Covidence. Data items included study characteristics (country in which the study was conducted, study funding, study setting) and health literacy tool characteristics (tool user, types of questions in the tool, method of tool administration, if the tool was created by the study team, and if a full version was available in the publication). DATA SYNTHESIS: We included 92 articles describing 84 health literacy tools. Tools measured: 1) topic-specific clinical knowledge (e.g., organ donation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; n = 24/84, 29%; NICU: n = 9; PICU: n = 1; ICU: n = 14); 2) ICU prognosis, diagnosis, and treatment (n = 23/84, 27%; NICU: 6; PICU: 3; ICU: n = 15); 3) neonatal and parenting (n = 13/84, 15%; all NICU); 4) general health literacy abilities (n = 11/84, 13%; NICU: n = 6; PICU: n = 2; ICU: n = 7); 5) information needs (n = 4/84, 5%; NICU: n = 1; PICU: n = 0; ICU: n = 3); 6) readiness for discharge (n = 3/84, 4%; all NICU); 7) decision-making (n = 3/84, 4%; all NICU); 8) health-related behaviors (n = 2/84, 2%; NICU: n = 1; ICU: n = 1); and 9) research participation (n = 1/84, 1%; NICU). CONCLUSIONS: Although several health literacy tools exist, they often focus on individual knowledge of specific aspects of ICU care, with less attention to how understanding is produced within the clinical context through interactions among patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers. This may limit their ability to reflect how health literacy functions in critical illness. Assessment of health literacy requires pairing the appropriate tools with interaction-focused approaches to guide communication and support informed decision-making in ICU settings.

Critical Care Medicine
Alberta Health Services (CA), University of Alberta (CA), University of Calgary (CA), Hotchkiss Brain Institute (CA), O'Brien Institute for Public Health (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.