Mit Nietzsche und Marx: Jenseits des Ressentiments – gegen Elitenpopulismus

Abstract This article reconstructs the complementary critiques of capitalist modernity in Nietzsche and Marx and the potential corrective function they may play for each other (1). It reminds us that the collective singular of Marxism, as a historical reality of internationality, has always been plural and thus encompasses such diverse currents as the ‘Western’ Frankfurt School and ‘Eastern’ Marxism-Leninism (2). From here, it proceeds to the contemporary diagnosis of ressentiment widespread within today’s fascising forces. Both the clear differences and the obvious overlaps between current applications and Nietzsche’s pioneering work in coining the term are considered (3). In a next step, the article proposes a Marxist reading of Nietzsche’s concept as an analytical tool to grasp social-psychological structures of capitalism, and particularly of authoritarian neoliberalism (4). Moving beyond the ‘helpless anti-fascism’ (W. F. Haug) of liberal interpretations, the conclusion argues that the material foundation of ressentiment can only be undermined if democracies emancipate themselves from their conformity to the market (5).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nietzscheforschung
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/nifo-2026-013
Primary Topic
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mit Nietzsche und Marx: Jenseits des Ressentiments – gegen Elitenpopulismus

Lukas Meisner
Nietzscheforschung
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
article

Mit Nietzsche und Marx: Jenseits des Ressentiments – gegen Elitenpopulismus

Lukas Meisner
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article reconstructs the complementary critiques of capitalist modernity in Nietzsche and Marx and the potential corrective function they may play for each other (1). It reminds us that the collective singular of Marxism, as a historical reality of internationality, has always been plural and thus encompasses such diverse currents as the ‘Western’ Frankfurt School and ‘Eastern’ Marxism-Leninism (2). From here, it proceeds to the contemporary diagnosis of ressentiment widespread within today’s fascising forces. Both the clear differences and the obvious overlaps between current applications and Nietzsche’s pioneering work in coining the term are considered (3). In a next step, the article proposes a Marxist reading of Nietzsche’s concept as an analytical tool to grasp social-psychological structures of capitalism, and particularly of authoritarian neoliberalism (4). Moving beyond the ‘helpless anti-fascism’ (W. F. Haug) of liberal interpretations, the conclusion argues that the material foundation of ressentiment can only be undermined if democracies emancipate themselves from their conformity to the market (5).

NietzscheforschungVol. 33(1)
Berlin School of Economics and Law (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.