From school improvement to instructional practice: the role of school- versus team-level capacity

This study examines whether school improvement capacity (SIC), traditionally conceptualized as a school-wide property, benefits from incorporating a team-level perspective. Previous research has advanced our understanding of school-wide conditions that enable improvement but largely overlooked that improvement processes often unfold within teams. Drawing on data from 662 teachers at 32 primary schools organized into 104 teams, we investigated: (a) whether schools and teams differ in the degree of within-unit agreement in perceptions of SIC dimension, and (b) how average levels and within-unit variability in perceived SIC relate to instructional practice at both levels. We compared ICCs across levels and conducted regression analyses separately for schools and teams. Although differences in ICCs were not significant, substantial variance was located at the team level. Further, associations with implementation of new ideas in instructional practice were stronger at the team level. The findings underscore the relevance of extending SIC to the team level.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
School Effectiveness and School Improvement
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2026.2744285
Primary Topic
Educational Assessment and Improvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From school improvement to instructional practice: the role of school- versus team-level capacity

Beat Rechsteiner, Urs Grob, Katharina Maag Merki, Andrea Wullschleger et al.
School Effectiveness and School Improvement
Educational Assessment and Improvement
article

From school improvement to instructional practice: the role of school- versus team-level capacity

Beat Rechsteiner, Urs Grob, Katharina Maag Merki, Andrea Wullschleger, Ladina Zumsteg
article en

Abstract

This study examines whether school improvement capacity (SIC), traditionally conceptualized as a school-wide property, benefits from incorporating a team-level perspective. Previous research has advanced our understanding of school-wide conditions that enable improvement but largely overlooked that improvement processes often unfold within teams. Drawing on data from 662 teachers at 32 primary schools organized into 104 teams, we investigated: (a) whether schools and teams differ in the degree of within-unit agreement in perceptions of SIC dimension, and (b) how average levels and within-unit variability in perceived SIC relate to instructional practice at both levels. We compared ICCs across levels and conducted regression analyses separately for schools and teams. Although differences in ICCs were not significant, substantial variance was located at the team level. Further, associations with implementation of new ideas in instructional practice were stronger at the team level. The findings underscore the relevance of extending SIC to the team level.

School Effectiveness and School Improvement
University of Zurich (CH), University of Teacher Education Lucerne (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Educational Assessment and Improvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.