Perceiving Politics: Considering the Political Categorization of Faces

Abstract Categorizing people into groups is a fundamentally human trait, but we know very little about how people assign political identities to strangers. Across two innovative survey experiments, we consider how people politically categorize others according to a single source of information: faces. We find that displays of emotions, particularly negative emotions, predict the political sorting of strangers. Faces featuring negative emotions are categorized as out-partisans, whereas faces exhibiting happiness are categorized as co-partisans.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental Political Science
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/xps.2026.10041
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceiving Politics: Considering the Political Categorization of Faces

Thomas Bergeron, Natasha Goel, Blake Lee‐Whiting
Journal of Experimental Political Science
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Perceiving Politics: Considering the Political Categorization of Faces

Thomas Bergeron, Natasha Goel, Blake Lee‐Whiting
article en

Abstract

Abstract Categorizing people into groups is a fundamentally human trait, but we know very little about how people assign political identities to strangers. Across two innovative survey experiments, we consider how people politically categorize others according to a single source of information: faces. We find that displays of emotions, particularly negative emotions, predict the political sorting of strangers. Faces featuring negative emotions are categorized as out-partisans, whereas faces exhibiting happiness are categorized as co-partisans.

Journal of Experimental Political Science
University of Toronto (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.