The dynamics of framing in dialogue

In this paper, we propose a fine-grained, empirically-driven formalisation of framing in discourse, with a particular focus on dialogical interaction. This formalisation provides an operationalization of framing that lays the foundation for subsequently (i) designing guidelines for the annotation of framing moves in large-scale dialogue datasets and (ii) implementing computational models that can be informed with the necessary cornerstones of linguistically-motivated models of framing. The core assumptions of our model are based on Entman (1993) who defines framing as the way “to select some aspects of a perceived reality and to make them more salient”. But we go beyond the work of Entman to show, in abstract, generalised terms, what it means to use framing to make things more salient and, furthermore, how such salience can be changed through framing dynamics. The paper describes the formal underpinnings of the ways that frames evolve and are reacted to in dialogue by way of seven framing moves . These moves characterise how interlocutors modify salience from one frame to another. Through our model, it becomes possible to capture both local and long-distance structures of framing in natural communication. We illustrate the workings of the model based on two real-life examples of framing in dialogue and highlight how this model can connect to contemporary pragmatic models of communication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pragmatics
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2026.09.010
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The dynamics of framing in dialogue

Christopher Klamm, Henning Wachsmuth, Zlata Kikteva, Steve Oswald et al.
Journal of Pragmatics
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
article

The dynamics of framing in dialogue

Christopher Klamm, Henning Wachsmuth, Zlata Kikteva, Steve Oswald, Manfred Stede, Annette Hautli-Janisz, Chris Reed, Meghdut Sengupta, Wassiliki Siskou
article en

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a fine-grained, empirically-driven formalisation of framing in discourse, with a particular focus on dialogical interaction. This formalisation provides an operationalization of framing that lays the foundation for subsequently (i) designing guidelines for the annotation of framing moves in large-scale dialogue datasets and (ii) implementing computational models that can be informed with the necessary cornerstones of linguistically-motivated models of framing. The core assumptions of our model are based on Entman (1993) who defines framing as the way “to select some aspects of a perceived reality and to make them more salient”. But we go beyond the work of Entman to show, in abstract, generalised terms, what it means to use framing to make things more salient and, furthermore, how such salience can be changed through framing dynamics. The paper describes the formal underpinnings of the ways that frames evolve and are reacted to in dialogue by way of seven framing moves . These moves characterise how interlocutors modify salience from one frame to another. Through our model, it becomes possible to capture both local and long-distance structures of framing in natural communication. We illustrate the workings of the model based on two real-life examples of framing in dialogue and highlight how this model can connect to contemporary pragmatic models of communication.

Journal of PragmaticsVol. 266
Leibniz University Hannover (DE), University of Fribourg (CH), University of Potsdam (DE), University of Dundee (GB), University of Mannheim (DE), University of Passau (DE), University of Konstanz (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Volkswagen Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.