Practice Preferences of Mohs Histology Technicians: A Web-Based Survey

BACKGROUND: Frozen section processing (FSP) enables real-time histologic margin assessment during Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). FSP techniques are variable, and processing speeds are poorly characterized. OBJECTIVE: To identify rate-limiting steps and technique variations in FSP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A web-based survey was distributed to MMS and dermatopathology technicians assessing slow steps, challenging tissue types, technique variability, prevalence techniques, and practice preferences. RESULTS: A 5-point Likert rating of 3 to 5 was defined as slow. Response rates above 50% categorized the step as slow, and response rates below 50% categorized the step as fast. Slow steps included flattening/debulking (78%), sectioning (58%), staining (58%), and embedding (53%). Fast steps included aligning the cryotome (40%), acquiring the sample (22%), mounting to a chuck (18%), mounting to a slide (16%), inking (9%), and adding a coverslip (8%). Difficult-to-section tissues were adipose (65%), cartilage (46%), and thin tissue (39%). Variable steps include flattening/debulking (36%) and embedding (36%). The most common preparation method was the glass slide technique (63%), then the heat extractor (28%), and finally well bars (9%). Most did not use an embedding device (59%). CONCLUSION: Flattening/debulking, embedding, sectioning, and staining can benefit from increased processing speed. Simplifying adipose, cartilage, and thin tissue processing can reduce the burden on technicians.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dermatologic Surgery
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/dss.0000000000005391
Primary Topic
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practice Preferences of Mohs Histology Technicians: A Web-Based Survey

Steven R. Feldman, Matthew L. Hrin, Christine Ahn, Ainsley J. Ruley et al.
Dermatologic Surgery
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
article

Practice Preferences of Mohs Histology Technicians: A Web-Based Survey

Steven R. Feldman, Matthew L. Hrin, Christine Ahn, Ainsley J. Ruley, Summer Wong, Chenan A. Huang, Jaime M. Lane
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Frozen section processing (FSP) enables real-time histologic margin assessment during Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). FSP techniques are variable, and processing speeds are poorly characterized. OBJECTIVE: To identify rate-limiting steps and technique variations in FSP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A web-based survey was distributed to MMS and dermatopathology technicians assessing slow steps, challenging tissue types, technique variability, prevalence techniques, and practice preferences. RESULTS: A 5-point Likert rating of 3 to 5 was defined as slow. Response rates above 50% categorized the step as slow, and response rates below 50% categorized the step as fast. Slow steps included flattening/debulking (78%), sectioning (58%), staining (58%), and embedding (53%). Fast steps included aligning the cryotome (40%), acquiring the sample (22%), mounting to a chuck (18%), mounting to a slide (16%), inking (9%), and adding a coverslip (8%). Difficult-to-section tissues were adipose (65%), cartilage (46%), and thin tissue (39%). Variable steps include flattening/debulking (36%) and embedding (36%). The most common preparation method was the glass slide technique (63%), then the heat extractor (28%), and finally well bars (9%). Most did not use an embedding device (59%). CONCLUSION: Flattening/debulking, embedding, sectioning, and staining can benefit from increased processing speed. Simplifying adipose, cartilage, and thin tissue processing can reduce the burden on technicians.

Dermatologic Surgery
Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US), Wake Forest University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.