Capability-Based Framework for Incarcerated Women's Health: Building on Amartya Sen Approach

The Capability Approach (CA) offers a useful way to evaluate prison health that goes beyond service provision or patient satisfaction. Researchers have applied it in public health, prison health, and criminal justice, but rarely to the health of incarcerated women. This paper begins to fill that gap. It proposes a gender-responsive, rights-based capability framework to evaluate women’s real freedom to achieve good health. The research question is: how can the Capability Approach help evaluate and strengthen incarcerated women’s health freedoms? The paper uses a targeted narrative synthesis and a conceptual framework analysis, following Jabareen (2009). This method combines theoretical clarification, purposive selection of capability domains, and a critique of conventional indicators. This review argues that we should assess incarcerated women’s well-being through two lenses: capabilities, the real freedoms to reach valued states of health, and functionings, what women actually achieve with dignity and autonomy. Drawing on international reports and qualitative studies, the paper suggests that standard indicators may understate how institutional constraints, coercion, stigma, and unequal conditions restrict women’s agency. In some settings, reported satisfaction may simply reflect adaptation to deprivation rather than genuinely adequate care. These are interpretive claims drawn from the literature, not new findings from this study, and they still need empirical testing. As a preliminary conceptual proposal, the paper sets out six capability domains, presented in Table 1, without claiming to define a universal set; the abstract illustrates four of them , bodily integrity, reproductive autonomy, psychosocial well-being, and health-related agency , and examines their link with concrete functioning such as dignified menstrual care or respectful maternity services. This preliminary framework helps structure a rights-based, gender-responsive model of prison health. It can serve as a starting point for empirical research and for evaluating reforms in low- and middle-income settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23369208
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Capability-Based Framework for Incarcerated Women's Health: Building on Amartya Sen Approach

Maria Mazouri, Laila Maghfour, Rachid Gouifrane, Hind Tak Tak et al.
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Capability-Based Framework for Incarcerated Women's Health: Building on Amartya Sen Approach

Maria Mazouri, Laila Maghfour, Rachid Gouifrane, Hind Tak Tak, Jamal Tikouk, Sanaa Deblij, Dehbi Badr, Omar ABIDI, Aziz RAZOKI, Bouchaib BAHLAOUANE
article en

Abstract

The Capability Approach (CA) offers a useful way to evaluate prison health that goes beyond service provision or patient satisfaction. Researchers have applied it in public health, prison health, and criminal justice, but rarely to the health of incarcerated women. This paper begins to fill that gap. It proposes a gender-responsive, rights-based capability framework to evaluate women’s real freedom to achieve good health. The research question is: how can the Capability Approach help evaluate and strengthen incarcerated women’s health freedoms? The paper uses a targeted narrative synthesis and a conceptual framework analysis, following Jabareen (2009). This method combines theoretical clarification, purposive selection of capability domains, and a critique of conventional indicators. This review argues that we should assess incarcerated women’s well-being through two lenses: capabilities, the real freedoms to reach valued states of health, and functionings, what women actually achieve with dignity and autonomy. Drawing on international reports and qualitative studies, the paper suggests that standard indicators may understate how institutional constraints, coercion, stigma, and unequal conditions restrict women’s agency. In some settings, reported satisfaction may simply reflect adaptation to deprivation rather than genuinely adequate care. These are interpretive claims drawn from the literature, not new findings from this study, and they still need empirical testing. As a preliminary conceptual proposal, the paper sets out six capability domains, presented in Table 1, without claiming to define a universal set; the abstract illustrates four of them , bodily integrity, reproductive autonomy, psychosocial well-being, and health-related agency , and examines their link with concrete functioning such as dignified menstrual care or respectful maternity services. This preliminary framework helps structure a rights-based, gender-responsive model of prison health. It can serve as a starting point for empirical research and for evaluating reforms in low- and middle-income settings.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Instituts Supérieurs des Professions Infirmières et Techniques de Santé (MA), Université Hassan 1er (MA), University of Hassan II Casablanca (MA)
Good health and well-being, Reduced inequalities, Gender equality, Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.