Earlobe Blood Flow Responses to Different Intensities of Inspiratory Resistance Loading in Healthy Young Men

Background and objectiveInspiratory resistance loading may alter peripheral circulation through changes in intrathoracic pressure and respiratory muscle pump activity.However, the relationship between inspiratory resistance intensity and peripheral blood flow remains unclear.This study aimed to investigate the response of earlobe blood flow (EBF) to varying intensities of inspiratory resistance loading in healthy young men. MethodsSixteen healthy young men performed multistep inspiratory resistance loading at 0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80% of maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) under incremental and decremental loading conditions on separate days.EBF was continuously measured, and the EBF ratio was calculated by dividing EBF at each loading intensity by resting EBF.The effects of loading intensity and loading condition were assessed using a linear mixed model.Changes in the EBF ratio across loading intervals were additionally evaluated using the slope (ΔEBF ratio/Δ% MIP). ResultsThe EBF ratio increased significantly with increasing loading intensity (F(4,135) = 11.89).The EBF ratio was significantly higher at 40%, 60%, and 80% MIP than at 0% MIP, whereas no significant difference was observed between 0% and 20% MIP.Neither the loading condition nor its interaction with loading intensity was significant.The slope of the EBF ratio did not differ significantly among loading intervals (F(3,105) = 1.29). ConclusionInspiratory resistance loading increased peripheral blood flow at low-to-moderate intensities, with the EBF response appearing to attenuate at approximately 40% MIP and above.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.117904
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Earlobe Blood Flow Responses to Different Intensities of Inspiratory Resistance Loading in Healthy Young Men

Kazuki Okura, Kakeru Hasegawa, Yusuke Takahashi, Daido Miyamoto et al.
Cureus
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
article

Earlobe Blood Flow Responses to Different Intensities of Inspiratory Resistance Loading in Healthy Young Men

Kazuki Okura, Kakeru Hasegawa, Yusuke Takahashi, Daido Miyamoto, Ai Abe
article en

Abstract

Background and objectiveInspiratory resistance loading may alter peripheral circulation through changes in intrathoracic pressure and respiratory muscle pump activity.However, the relationship between inspiratory resistance intensity and peripheral blood flow remains unclear.This study aimed to investigate the response of earlobe blood flow (EBF) to varying intensities of inspiratory resistance loading in healthy young men. MethodsSixteen healthy young men performed multistep inspiratory resistance loading at 0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80% of maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) under incremental and decremental loading conditions on separate days.EBF was continuously measured, and the EBF ratio was calculated by dividing EBF at each loading intensity by resting EBF.The effects of loading intensity and loading condition were assessed using a linear mixed model.Changes in the EBF ratio across loading intervals were additionally evaluated using the slope (ΔEBF ratio/Δ% MIP). ResultsThe EBF ratio increased significantly with increasing loading intensity (F(4,135) = 11.89).The EBF ratio was significantly higher at 40%, 60%, and 80% MIP than at 0% MIP, whereas no significant difference was observed between 0% and 20% MIP.Neither the loading condition nor its interaction with loading intensity was significant.The slope of the EBF ratio did not differ significantly among loading intervals (F(3,105) = 1.29). ConclusionInspiratory resistance loading increased peripheral blood flow at low-to-moderate intensities, with the EBF response appearing to attenuate at approximately 40% MIP and above.

Cureus
Akita University Hospital (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.