A pharmacokinetic study comparing a low-dose estrogen contraceptive transdermal system with an oral contraceptive tablet in healthy adult females

Background This study evaluated pharmacokinetics (PK) of a once-weekly low-dose estrogen contraceptive transdermal system (TDS) and a once-daily combined oral contraceptive (COC) in healthy women.Research design and methods In this Phase 1 study, 24 healthy women aged 18–35 years were randomized to crossover sequence of three consecutive 168–hour applications of the norelgestromin ([NGMN] drug load 4.86 mg/ethinyl estradiol ([EE] drug load 0.264 mg) TDS to the abdomen (Treatment A) or buttock (Treatment B), followed by once-daily COC (drug load 0.18 mg norgestimate/0.025 mg EE) for 7 days (Treatment C). Plasma NGMN and EE concentrations were assessed using standard PK parameters; application-site irritation, residual patch analysis, and safety were also evaluated.Results Variability in NGMN and EE exposure was lower for Treatments A and B versus Treatment C (AUCτ,ss: NGMN, 38.4% and 31.7% versus 47.0%; EE, 49.3% and 35.4% versus 51.2%) with comparable or lower Cp,ss(max) variability. EE Cp,ss(max) and normalized exposure were lower with the NGMN/EE TDS. No serious adverse events occurred. Residual patch analysis indicated delivery of ~200 µg/day NGMN and 19 µg/day EE.Conclusions The NGMN/EE TDS demonstrated lower PK variability, EE peak concentrations and normalized EE exposure than the COC. No new safety signals were reported.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17425247.2026.2748749
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A pharmacokinetic study comparing a low-dose estrogen contraceptive transdermal system with an oral contraceptive tablet in healthy adult females

Debdipta Bose, Andrew A. Shaw, Janet K. Gersten, Tieliang Yan et al.
Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

A pharmacokinetic study comparing a low-dose estrogen contraceptive transdermal system with an oral contraceptive tablet in healthy adult females

Debdipta Bose, Andrew A. Shaw, Janet K. Gersten, Tieliang Yan, Sandeep Jagtap, Mark Liu, Matthew Hummel
article en

Abstract

Background This study evaluated pharmacokinetics (PK) of a once-weekly low-dose estrogen contraceptive transdermal system (TDS) and a once-daily combined oral contraceptive (COC) in healthy women.Research design and methods In this Phase 1 study, 24 healthy women aged 18–35 years were randomized to crossover sequence of three consecutive 168–hour applications of the norelgestromin ([NGMN] drug load 4.86 mg/ethinyl estradiol ([EE] drug load 0.264 mg) TDS to the abdomen (Treatment A) or buttock (Treatment B), followed by once-daily COC (drug load 0.18 mg norgestimate/0.025 mg EE) for 7 days (Treatment C). Plasma NGMN and EE concentrations were assessed using standard PK parameters; application-site irritation, residual patch analysis, and safety were also evaluated.Results Variability in NGMN and EE exposure was lower for Treatments A and B versus Treatment C (AUCτ,ss: NGMN, 38.4% and 31.7% versus 47.0%; EE, 49.3% and 35.4% versus 51.2%) with comparable or lower Cp,ss(max) variability. EE Cp,ss(max) and normalized exposure were lower with the NGMN/EE TDS. No serious adverse events occurred. Residual patch analysis indicated delivery of ~200 µg/day NGMN and 19 µg/day EE.Conclusions The NGMN/EE TDS demonstrated lower PK variability, EE peak concentrations and normalized EE exposure than the COC. No new safety signals were reported.

Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery
Tris Pharma (United States) (US), Viatris
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.