An Unexpected Benefit of the Cashless Society: Cash Use and Endoscopic Oesophageal Foreign Body Removal in England

BackgroundReduced cash use could decrease children's access to coins and subsequent oesophageal foreign body removal.We examined national trends while distinguishing anatomical coding and endoscopic technique. MethodsPublic Hospital Episode Statistics for England, 2014/15-2024/25, were compared with United Kingdom cash payment shares for 2014-2024.Primary-procedure episodes for flexible and rigid oesophageal removal were combined; children aged 0-14 years and broader upper gastrointestinal coding were examined separately.Correlations of annual levels and first differences were descriptive. ResultsOesophageal episodes decreased from 1,615 to 1,174 (27.3%), including a reduction from 563 to 330 (41.4%) in children.Cash share decreased from 48% to 9%.Annual-level correlations were strong (all ages, r=0.935; children, r=0.899), whereas first-difference correlations were 0.066 and -0.440.Including broader upper gastrointestinal removal reversed the all-age trend: 3,135 to 3,901 episodes (24.4% increase). ConclusionsDeclining oesophageal removal coincided with declining cash use, but reductions were not proportional.Whilst these aggregate data cannot identify swallowed coins or establish definite causation, they support the hypothesis that an upward trend in cashless payments caused fewer removals of oesophageal foreign bodies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.117890
Primary Topic
Foreign Body Medical Cases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Unexpected Benefit of the Cashless Society: Cash Use and Endoscopic Oesophageal Foreign Body Removal in England

Oliver Sanders, Tarik Abed, Jonathan M. Philpott
Cureus
Foreign Body Medical Cases
article

An Unexpected Benefit of the Cashless Society: Cash Use and Endoscopic Oesophageal Foreign Body Removal in England

Oliver Sanders, Tarik Abed, Jonathan M. Philpott
article en

Abstract

BackgroundReduced cash use could decrease children's access to coins and subsequent oesophageal foreign body removal.We examined national trends while distinguishing anatomical coding and endoscopic technique. MethodsPublic Hospital Episode Statistics for England, 2014/15-2024/25, were compared with United Kingdom cash payment shares for 2014-2024.Primary-procedure episodes for flexible and rigid oesophageal removal were combined; children aged 0-14 years and broader upper gastrointestinal coding were examined separately.Correlations of annual levels and first differences were descriptive. ResultsOesophageal episodes decreased from 1,615 to 1,174 (27.3%), including a reduction from 563 to 330 (41.4%) in children.Cash share decreased from 48% to 9%.Annual-level correlations were strong (all ages, r=0.935; children, r=0.899), whereas first-difference correlations were 0.066 and -0.440.Including broader upper gastrointestinal removal reversed the all-age trend: 3,135 to 3,901 episodes (24.4% increase). ConclusionsDeclining oesophageal removal coincided with declining cash use, but reductions were not proportional.Whilst these aggregate data cannot identify swallowed coins or establish definite causation, they support the hypothesis that an upward trend in cashless payments caused fewer removals of oesophageal foreign bodies.

Cureus
Southend University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Southend Hospital (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Foreign Body Medical Cases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.