SEMANTIC EXTENSION OF CORE AGRICULTURAL VERBS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK

This article examines the semantic extension of core agricultural verbs in English and Uzbek from a cognitive-semantic perspective. Nine pairs of verbs denoting the basic stages of the farming cycle – sowing, ploughing, cultivating, grafting, weeding, reaping, harvesting, threshing and winnowing – are analysed on the basis of explanatory, etymological and phraseological dictionaries of both languages. The study identifies the mechanisms (metaphor, metonymy and specialisation) through which these verbs acquire abstract meanings and classifies the resulting senses into semantic domains such as causation, consequence, nurturing, selection, destruction and waste. The results show that the two languages converge where the extension is grounded in the shared conceptual metaphor IDEAS / ACTIONS ARE PLANTS, but diverge in the aspect of the agricultural scene that is profiled: English tends to foreground the retained product and the effort involved, whereas Uzbek more often foregrounds the driving force, the loss and the tending process. The findings are relevant to contrastive lexicology, bilingual lexicography and translation practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arabian journal of science.
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23357854
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SEMANTIC EXTENSION OF CORE AGRICULTURAL VERBS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK

Worldly Knowledge Publishing Centre, Bekchanova Nazokat Allanazar qizi
Arabian journal of science.
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
article

SEMANTIC EXTENSION OF CORE AGRICULTURAL VERBS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK

Worldly Knowledge Publishing Centre, Bekchanova Nazokat Allanazar qizi
article en

Abstract

This article examines the semantic extension of core agricultural verbs in English and Uzbek from a cognitive-semantic perspective. Nine pairs of verbs denoting the basic stages of the farming cycle – sowing, ploughing, cultivating, grafting, weeding, reaping, harvesting, threshing and winnowing – are analysed on the basis of explanatory, etymological and phraseological dictionaries of both languages. The study identifies the mechanisms (metaphor, metonymy and specialisation) through which these verbs acquire abstract meanings and classifies the resulting senses into semantic domains such as causation, consequence, nurturing, selection, destruction and waste. The results show that the two languages converge where the extension is grounded in the shared conceptual metaphor IDEAS / ACTIONS ARE PLANTS, but diverge in the aspect of the agricultural scene that is profiled: English tends to foreground the retained product and the effort involved, whereas Uzbek more often foregrounds the driving force, the loss and the tending process. The findings are relevant to contrastive lexicology, bilingual lexicography and translation practice.

Arabian journal of science.
Urgench State University (UZ)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.