Epidemiology of Uncontrolled and Treatment‑Resistant Hypertension: A Registry‑Based Observational Study

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to describe blood pressure control rates and prevalence of treatment resistant hypertension among diagnosed individuals. METHODS: , 2019, were included. Blood pressure control in diagnosed individuals was assessed using two targets: <140/90 mmHg and <130/80 mmHg. The prevalence of treatment-resistant hypertension defined by three commonly used criteria was calculated and its association with clinical characteristics, drug treatment patterns, and comorbidities were assessed. RESULTS: By the end of 2019, among those with a hypertension diagnosis, 57% (<140/90 mmHg) or 19% (<130/80 mmHg) had controlled blood pressure depending on the threshold used. The point prevalence of treatment-resistant hypertension ranged from <1% to 17% depending on definition and was associated with older age, higher body mass index, and multiple comorbidities including type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. CONCLUSION: Blood pressure control remains a major clinical challenge, with fewer than one in five patients with a hypertension diagnosis achieving <130/80 mmHg. The prevalence of treatment-resistant hypertension varied widely depending on the definition used and was closely associated with a greater burden of comorbidities, indicating an unmet need for improved strategies for this clinically challenging subgroup.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Blood Pressure
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2026.2749134
Primary Topic
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Epidemiology of Uncontrolled and Treatment‑Resistant Hypertension: A Registry‑Based Observational Study

Dan Henrohn, Mattias Brunström, Johan Sundström, Olof Karlberg et al.
Blood Pressure
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
article

Epidemiology of Uncontrolled and Treatment‑Resistant Hypertension: A Registry‑Based Observational Study

Dan Henrohn, Mattias Brunström, Johan Sundström, Olof Karlberg, Poyan Shojaiyan
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to describe blood pressure control rates and prevalence of treatment resistant hypertension among diagnosed individuals. METHODS: , 2019, were included. Blood pressure control in diagnosed individuals was assessed using two targets: <140/90 mmHg and <130/80 mmHg. The prevalence of treatment-resistant hypertension defined by three commonly used criteria was calculated and its association with clinical characteristics, drug treatment patterns, and comorbidities were assessed. RESULTS: By the end of 2019, among those with a hypertension diagnosis, 57% (<140/90 mmHg) or 19% (<130/80 mmHg) had controlled blood pressure depending on the threshold used. The point prevalence of treatment-resistant hypertension ranged from <1% to 17% depending on definition and was associated with older age, higher body mass index, and multiple comorbidities including type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. CONCLUSION: Blood pressure control remains a major clinical challenge, with fewer than one in five patients with a hypertension diagnosis achieving <130/80 mmHg. The prevalence of treatment-resistant hypertension varied widely depending on the definition used and was closely associated with a greater burden of comorbidities, indicating an unmet need for improved strategies for this clinically challenging subgroup.

Blood Pressure
Uppsala University (SE), The George Institute for Global Health (GB), UNSW Sydney (AU), Senceive (United Kingdom) (GB), Saint Göran Hospital (SE), The George Institute for Global Health (AU), AstraZeneca (France) (FR), AstraZeneca (Switzerland) (CH), AstraZeneca (Italy) (IT), Umeå University (SE)
AstraZeneca
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.