A win-based measure of player productivity in cricket: evidence from the Women’s Big Bash League between 2016/17 and 2025/26

Player productivity measurement is well developed in baseball, basketball and association football, but remains at an early stage in cricket. Existing approaches either operate at the team level, rely on externally imposed weighting schemes or apply ball-by-ball valuation frameworks that have not been validated against team outcomes. This paper develops the Cricket Win Score (CWS), a unified measure of player productivity that links individual contributions in batting and bowling to team winning percentage through the marginal value of player statistics. The methodology adopts a team-wins decomposition approach adapted to cricket’s two-sided production structure and is applied to ten seasons of Women’s Big Bash League data (2016/17 to 2025/26), covering 80 team-seasons and over 1700 player-seasons. CWS is validated against realised wins, the Pythagorean expected wins framework, and the cricWAR model. Aggregated CWS predicts team performance with a mean absolute error of 0.106 and a correlation of 0.852, outperforming the Pythagorean benchmark in the context of the WBBL. At the player level, CWS shows strong agreement with cricWAR, with Spearman correlations of 0.91 for batters and 0.97 for bowlers, and over 93% overlap in top-decile player identification in the WBBL. These findings demonstrate that a reduced-form, outcome-based metric can reliably capture player productivity in cricket.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Managing Sport and Leisure
Published
2026-10-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23750472.2026.2747309
Primary Topic
Sports Analytics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A win-based measure of player productivity in cricket: evidence from the Women’s Big Bash League between 2016/17 and 2025/26

Sarthak Mondal
Managing Sport and Leisure
Sports Analytics and Performance
article

A win-based measure of player productivity in cricket: evidence from the Women’s Big Bash League between 2016/17 and 2025/26

Sarthak Mondal
article en

Abstract

Player productivity measurement is well developed in baseball, basketball and association football, but remains at an early stage in cricket. Existing approaches either operate at the team level, rely on externally imposed weighting schemes or apply ball-by-ball valuation frameworks that have not been validated against team outcomes. This paper develops the Cricket Win Score (CWS), a unified measure of player productivity that links individual contributions in batting and bowling to team winning percentage through the marginal value of player statistics. The methodology adopts a team-wins decomposition approach adapted to cricket’s two-sided production structure and is applied to ten seasons of Women’s Big Bash League data (2016/17 to 2025/26), covering 80 team-seasons and over 1700 player-seasons. CWS is validated against realised wins, the Pythagorean expected wins framework, and the cricWAR model. Aggregated CWS predicts team performance with a mean absolute error of 0.106 and a correlation of 0.852, outperforming the Pythagorean benchmark in the context of the WBBL. At the player level, CWS shows strong agreement with cricWAR, with Spearman correlations of 0.91 for batters and 0.97 for bowlers, and over 93% overlap in top-decile player identification in the WBBL. These findings demonstrate that a reduced-form, outcome-based metric can reliably capture player productivity in cricket.

Managing Sport and Leisure
University of Portsmouth (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Sports Analytics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.