“New Way to Look at Shared Problems”: Team Science in Special Education Research

In special education, the complexity of serving individuals with disabilities and their families necessitates sustained interdisciplinary collaboration. However, little is known about how the principles of team science are valued and enacted within higher education programs that prepare the field's future scholars and practitioners. In this study, we examined the extent to which special education researchers value and engage in team science. Doctoral students, postdoctoral scholars, and faculty in special education completed a questionnaire that included both quantitative and qualitative data types. Data from 104 respondents were analyzed using descriptive statistics, cross-tabulations, and thematic analysis. More than 90% of survey respondents indicated that they valued team science (i.e., interdisciplinary research collaboration), and many reported engaging in it to some extent. Faculty, postdoctoral scholars, and students did not differ in their value for or engagement in such collaborations. Thematic analysis showed that respondents perceived benefits of team science for themselves and the field. Respondents also described barriers to team science and successful strategies for overcoming them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Exceptional Children
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029261495301
Primary Topic
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“New Way to Look at Shared Problems”: Team Science in Special Education Research

Zhenying Jiang, Jinjun Xiong, Robert C. Pennington, Hedda Meadan et al.
Exceptional Children
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
article

“New Way to Look at Shared Problems”: Team Science in Special Education Research

Zhenying Jiang, Jinjun Xiong, Robert C. Pennington, Hedda Meadan, Carol Miller, Alexandra M. Reilly, Sheena Jennings
article en

Abstract

In special education, the complexity of serving individuals with disabilities and their families necessitates sustained interdisciplinary collaboration. However, little is known about how the principles of team science are valued and enacted within higher education programs that prepare the field's future scholars and practitioners. In this study, we examined the extent to which special education researchers value and engage in team science. Doctoral students, postdoctoral scholars, and faculty in special education completed a questionnaire that included both quantitative and qualitative data types. Data from 104 respondents were analyzed using descriptive statistics, cross-tabulations, and thematic analysis. More than 90% of survey respondents indicated that they valued team science (i.e., interdisciplinary research collaboration), and many reported engaging in it to some extent. Faculty, postdoctoral scholars, and students did not differ in their value for or engagement in such collaborations. Thematic analysis showed that respondents perceived benefits of team science for themselves and the field. Respondents also described barriers to team science and successful strategies for overcoming them.

Exceptional Children
University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US), Pennsylvania State University (US), University of Kentucky (US), College of Charleston (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
Quality education, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.