Exploring Policy for Generative Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Education: Student and Faculty Perceptions

BACKGROUND: Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) is rapidly reshaping higher education, creating opportunities and challenges related to academic integrity, educator readiness, and policy clarity, particularly in nursing education. PURPOSE: To examine nurse educator and student perspectives on GAI use, institutional policies, syllabus language, and best practices in nursing education. METHODS: A descriptive quantitative survey was completed by 211 nurse educators and 89 nursing students (N = 300) across diverse nursing programs. Data were analyzed by program type, learning model, and degree level. RESULTS: Findings revealed widespread uncertainty and inconsistent communication of GAI policies and expectations. Students reported greater confusion regarding acceptable use and institutional guidance, while educators described decentralized and inconsistent approaches. Demographic factors were not significantly associated with perceptions. CONCLUSIONS: Nursing education requires clearer, more accessible, and unified approaches to GAI governance to support ethical, effective, and pedagogically sound integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nurse Educator
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/nne.0000000000002303
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Policy for Generative Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Education: Student and Faculty Perceptions

Barbara J. Patterson, Helena M.H. Nadder
Nurse Educator
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Exploring Policy for Generative Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Education: Student and Faculty Perceptions

Barbara J. Patterson, Helena M.H. Nadder
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) is rapidly reshaping higher education, creating opportunities and challenges related to academic integrity, educator readiness, and policy clarity, particularly in nursing education. PURPOSE: To examine nurse educator and student perspectives on GAI use, institutional policies, syllabus language, and best practices in nursing education. METHODS: A descriptive quantitative survey was completed by 211 nurse educators and 89 nursing students (N = 300) across diverse nursing programs. Data were analyzed by program type, learning model, and degree level. RESULTS: Findings revealed widespread uncertainty and inconsistent communication of GAI policies and expectations. Students reported greater confusion regarding acceptable use and institutional guidance, while educators described decentralized and inconsistent approaches. Demographic factors were not significantly associated with perceptions. CONCLUSIONS: Nursing education requires clearer, more accessible, and unified approaches to GAI governance to support ethical, effective, and pedagogically sound integration.

Nurse Educator
Walden University (US)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.