Recurrent pediatric emergency department visits among technology-dependent children: a single-center retrospective cohort study

Advances in medical technology have increased the number of children who depend on long-term medical devices to sustain vital functions. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the reasons for and problems associated with pediatric emergency department (ED) visits among technology-dependent children. Technology-dependent patients aged 1 month to 18 years who presented to the pediatric ED of a university hospital between October 2019 and December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 367 ED visits by 53 patients were evaluated. The median age at first presentation was 47 months; 64% of patients were male, and 92.5% had a neurological underlying condition (most commonly cerebral palsy). Of the visits, 97.5% were made via the 112 emergency ambulance system and 68.4% occurred during working hours. The two most common reasons for presentation were non-device-related acute complaints (38.4%; chiefly fever and low oxygen saturation) and routine check-ups without an active complaint (34.6%; mainly outpatient clinic control, scheduled tube changes, and medical report renewal). Pneumonia was the most common reason for pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission (67.7%); 65.9% of visits resulted in discharge from the ED. Eight of the 53 patients (15%, 95% CI 7.9–27.1%) died during the study period. In cluster-robust multivariable analysis, a neurological primary diagnosis and non-working-hours presentation were independently associated with PICU admission, while working-hours presentation was the strongest independent predictor of a potentially-preventable visit (OR 5.39). In this cohort of technology-dependent children with predominantly neurological conditions, a substantial proportion of ED visits appeared potentially preventable; these findings apply primarily to children with neurological complexity rather than to those with isolated cardiac or respiratory conditions. Routine check-up visits appeared to reflect limited access to daytime ambulatory follow-up and scheduled device-change services rather than acute need. Because working-hours presentation was the strongest predictor of potentially preventable visits, strengthening daytime primary and outpatient care access, such as same-day device clinics, together with specialized home care and palliative care services, may redirect these visits away from the ED, complemented by caregiver education, scheduled cannula/tube changes, and regular device maintenance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Pediatrics
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-026-07848-6
Primary Topic
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recurrent pediatric emergency department visits among technology-dependent children: a single-center retrospective cohort study

E. Akman, Alkan Bal, Buket Kaynarsoy, Neslihan Zengın et al.
BMC Pediatrics
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
article

Recurrent pediatric emergency department visits among technology-dependent children: a single-center retrospective cohort study

E. Akman, Alkan Bal, Buket Kaynarsoy, Neslihan Zengın, Harun Aykurt
article en

Abstract

Advances in medical technology have increased the number of children who depend on long-term medical devices to sustain vital functions. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the reasons for and problems associated with pediatric emergency department (ED) visits among technology-dependent children. Technology-dependent patients aged 1 month to 18 years who presented to the pediatric ED of a university hospital between October 2019 and December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 367 ED visits by 53 patients were evaluated. The median age at first presentation was 47 months; 64% of patients were male, and 92.5% had a neurological underlying condition (most commonly cerebral palsy). Of the visits, 97.5% were made via the 112 emergency ambulance system and 68.4% occurred during working hours. The two most common reasons for presentation were non-device-related acute complaints (38.4%; chiefly fever and low oxygen saturation) and routine check-ups without an active complaint (34.6%; mainly outpatient clinic control, scheduled tube changes, and medical report renewal). Pneumonia was the most common reason for pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission (67.7%); 65.9% of visits resulted in discharge from the ED. Eight of the 53 patients (15%, 95% CI 7.9–27.1%) died during the study period. In cluster-robust multivariable analysis, a neurological primary diagnosis and non-working-hours presentation were independently associated with PICU admission, while working-hours presentation was the strongest independent predictor of a potentially-preventable visit (OR 5.39). In this cohort of technology-dependent children with predominantly neurological conditions, a substantial proportion of ED visits appeared potentially preventable; these findings apply primarily to children with neurological complexity rather than to those with isolated cardiac or respiratory conditions. Routine check-up visits appeared to reflect limited access to daytime ambulatory follow-up and scheduled device-change services rather than acute need. Because working-hours presentation was the strongest predictor of potentially preventable visits, strengthening daytime primary and outpatient care access, such as same-day device clinics, together with specialized home care and palliative care services, may redirect these visits away from the ED, complemented by caregiver education, scheduled cannula/tube changes, and regular device maintenance.

BMC Pediatrics
Manisa Celal Bayar University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Emergency and Acute Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.