Mortality risk stratification in contemporary myocardial infarction–related cardiogenic shock: development of AMICS-ADMIT prediction model and benchmarking of established scores

Background Mortality risk stratification in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) remains challenging with heterogeneous temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) use. We developed and temporally validated the admission-based AMICS-ADMIT model and bedside score and benchmarked them against established scores. Methods This retrospective single-centre study, reported according to TRIPOD+AI, included 479 consecutive patients with AMI-CS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between January 2017 and July 2025. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. AMICS-ADMIT was developed using multivariable logistic regression in the 2017–2022 cohort, internally evaluated by bootstrap resampling, and temporally validated in the 2023–2025 cohort. Missing data were multiply imputed. Performance was assessed using discrimination, calibration, and Brier scores. Benchmarking against CardShock, IABP-SHOCK II, and GRACE was restricted to temporal validation; tMCS-stratified performance was exploratory. Results In-hospital mortality was 42.6% (204/479). The final model included age, left ventricular ejection fraction, prior cardiopulmonary resuscitation, estimated glomerular filtration rate, vasoactive–inotropic score, and ST-segment elevation status. The continuous model achieved AUCs of 0.809 (95% CI 0.764–0.855) in development and 0.834 (95% CI 0.769–0.899) in temporal validation, with Brier scores of 0.176 and 0.167 and favourable calibration. The bedside score achieved AUCs of 0.777 (95% CI 0.728–0.826) and 0.775 (95% CI 0.699–0.851), respectively, with stepwise mortality separation across predefined risk categories. Discrimination did not differ significantly from CardShock, IABP-SHOCK II, or GRACE. Conclusions AMICS-ADMIT showed stable temporal performance and clinically interpretable early risk stratification in contemporary PCI-treated AMI-CS. External multicentre validation is required before clinical implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IJC Heart & Vasculature
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2026.102029
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mortality risk stratification in contemporary myocardial infarction–related cardiogenic shock: development of AMICS-ADMIT prediction model and benchmarking of established scores

Julian Kreutz, Styliani Syntila, Maryana Choukeir, Birgit Markus et al.
IJC Heart & Vasculature
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Mortality risk stratification in contemporary myocardial infarction–related cardiogenic shock: development of AMICS-ADMIT prediction model and benchmarking of established scores

Julian Kreutz, Styliani Syntila, Maryana Choukeir, Birgit Markus, Georgios Chatzis, Bernhard Schieffer, Klevis Mihali, Lukas Harbaum, Mykyta Fomin, Kornelia Neuner
article en

Abstract

Background Mortality risk stratification in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) remains challenging with heterogeneous temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) use. We developed and temporally validated the admission-based AMICS-ADMIT model and bedside score and benchmarked them against established scores. Methods This retrospective single-centre study, reported according to TRIPOD+AI, included 479 consecutive patients with AMI-CS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between January 2017 and July 2025. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. AMICS-ADMIT was developed using multivariable logistic regression in the 2017–2022 cohort, internally evaluated by bootstrap resampling, and temporally validated in the 2023–2025 cohort. Missing data were multiply imputed. Performance was assessed using discrimination, calibration, and Brier scores. Benchmarking against CardShock, IABP-SHOCK II, and GRACE was restricted to temporal validation; tMCS-stratified performance was exploratory. Results In-hospital mortality was 42.6% (204/479). The final model included age, left ventricular ejection fraction, prior cardiopulmonary resuscitation, estimated glomerular filtration rate, vasoactive–inotropic score, and ST-segment elevation status. The continuous model achieved AUCs of 0.809 (95% CI 0.764–0.855) in development and 0.834 (95% CI 0.769–0.899) in temporal validation, with Brier scores of 0.176 and 0.167 and favourable calibration. The bedside score achieved AUCs of 0.777 (95% CI 0.728–0.826) and 0.775 (95% CI 0.699–0.851), respectively, with stepwise mortality separation across predefined risk categories. Discrimination did not differ significantly from CardShock, IABP-SHOCK II, or GRACE. Conclusions AMICS-ADMIT showed stable temporal performance and clinically interpretable early risk stratification in contemporary PCI-treated AMI-CS. External multicentre validation is required before clinical implementation.

IJC Heart & VasculatureVol. 67
Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
Philipps-Universität Marburg
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.