“The measure of your [thinking] is to me unknown:” Aḥmad Fāris al-Shidyāq’s Comparative Epistemology in “Maqāmah on Chapter Thirteen”

Aḥmad Fāris al-Shidyāq (1804/5–1887) was an unusual Arab renaissance figure whose work spanned travel and fictional writing, Bible criticism and translations, Arabic lexicography, poetry, philology, and grammar. His intellectual and professional life involved working with several languages, including Arabic, English, French, Hebrew, Syriac, Latin, and Maltese. He lived a life marked by political upheavals and intellectual polemics, prompting his multiple conversions across Maronite Christianity, Protestantism, and Islam. Although his work has received scholarly attention for its comparisons of Mediterranean and European societies, his own understanding of comparative practice remains understudied. This article seeks to reconstruct al-Shidyāq’s comparative epistemology by examining his fictional and non-fictional writings. It argues that his critique of the limits of comparison, and of analogical reasoning as they were practiced in the nineteenth century, emerged from a critical, anti-institutional stance toward three communities that marginalized embodied experience as a site of knowledge: the clergy in Lebanon, British orientalist philologists and translators, and American missionary translators. This article first situates al-Shidyāq’s work within nineteenth-century comparative thought and practice. It then combines close textual analysis with insights from translation and embodiment studies, cultural history, and the history of science and ideas to reconstruct al-Shidyāq’s distinct comparative method. A micro-analysis of al-Shidyāq’s first maqāmah will demonstrate how his comparative practice is ethically grounded in the dynamic interplay between formal and harmonic analogies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Religions
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17101207
Primary Topic
Comparative and World Literature
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“The measure of your [thinking] is to me unknown:” Aḥmad Fāris al-Shidyāq’s Comparative Epistemology in “Maqāmah on Chapter Thirteen”

Rama Alhabian
Religions
Comparative and World Literature
article

“The measure of your [thinking] is to me unknown:” Aḥmad Fāris al-Shidyāq’s Comparative Epistemology in “Maqāmah on Chapter Thirteen”

Rama Alhabian
article en

Abstract

Aḥmad Fāris al-Shidyāq (1804/5–1887) was an unusual Arab renaissance figure whose work spanned travel and fictional writing, Bible criticism and translations, Arabic lexicography, poetry, philology, and grammar. His intellectual and professional life involved working with several languages, including Arabic, English, French, Hebrew, Syriac, Latin, and Maltese. He lived a life marked by political upheavals and intellectual polemics, prompting his multiple conversions across Maronite Christianity, Protestantism, and Islam. Although his work has received scholarly attention for its comparisons of Mediterranean and European societies, his own understanding of comparative practice remains understudied. This article seeks to reconstruct al-Shidyāq’s comparative epistemology by examining his fictional and non-fictional writings. It argues that his critique of the limits of comparison, and of analogical reasoning as they were practiced in the nineteenth century, emerged from a critical, anti-institutional stance toward three communities that marginalized embodied experience as a site of knowledge: the clergy in Lebanon, British orientalist philologists and translators, and American missionary translators. This article first situates al-Shidyāq’s work within nineteenth-century comparative thought and practice. It then combines close textual analysis with insights from translation and embodiment studies, cultural history, and the history of science and ideas to reconstruct al-Shidyāq’s distinct comparative method. A micro-analysis of al-Shidyāq’s first maqāmah will demonstrate how his comparative practice is ethically grounded in the dynamic interplay between formal and harmonic analogies.

ReligionsVol. 17(10)
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Comparative and World Literature
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.